Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

So...Balanta

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stainrodisalegend
    Platinum Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 13624

    #31
    Chris: I think you are right. But that probably means Dex as the other striker, and you have to ask will they score 35/ 40 goals between them? Be v surprised. They have their strong points but are they really the new Allen and Goddard?

    Scott: assuming we can't off-load Helguson or Agyman on their wages are you saying that means selling Dex? And if so, do you think that's what the club wd still ideally like to do?

    Comment

    • Rebel R's
      King of Pessimism
      • Mar 2009
      • 12266

      #32
      Originally posted by ScottJones
      Surely his earning his place now?
      for the next friendly i assume you mean?

      Comment

      • qpr_yuley
        Silver Seat
        • Apr 2009
        • 1961

        #33
        Fair play to him
        We're Queens Park Rangers, we rule supreme

        Comment

        • stanistheman
          Platinum Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 11151

          #34
          Originally posted by oldhoop
          Deffo over SDC!!!!!

          Would you also put Balanta in the side as a lone striker?

          Because for most of his games, that is effectively what QPR did with SDC.

          Comment

          Working...