Incenzo: QPR will need to sign a goalscorer in the January transfer window

[MYU]

More...

[stainrodisalegend]

Bit harsh to write Bothroyd off after - what? - three games and DJ off after how many minutes?

[Rich]

He didn't write them off he just said we may need to buy another striker in Jan which I agree with even if we had won 1-0 today.

[Ric-Roc]

Biggest plank on the airwaves.

Rangers maybe but verbal diorreah from Incenzo.

Yea we didn't take our chances tonight & others got cleared off the line that's football.

I'd be more worried if we never created a chance.

Another poor piece from Incenzo.

[Rebel R's]

NW has already said he wanted another striker so will happen

[RussRanger]

Never liked Incenzo since he "stole" a job from me. Having said that, thought it was a fair assessment tbh. Not saying Bothroyd was carp just that we may need another striker in the window. Kinda agree with that.

[Fez]

Yeah think Bothrod has made a pretty decent start, just needs to get that first goal. DJC will do well as a poacher. Agree that we could do with a quality striker in Jan, and would make sense to get one now we have the backing to do it.

[Del]

Yeah think Bothrod has made a pretty decent start, just needs to get that first goal. DJC will do well as a poacher. Agree that we could do with a quality striker in Jan, and would make sense to get one now we have the backing to do it.

Bothroyd actually played very well imo. He won every ball up to him and linked with the 2 behind and deeper 3 absolutely brilliantly. He just lacked a bit of sharpness in front of goal and should have scored.

Many might say DJ should play, and the conundrum being, yes he is more likely to have taken the chances, but he wouldn't win the ball in the first place to link up with the runners and start the attacks that led to the chances....

For me we have to stick with this system and team into the next game, assuming traore has only got cramp and is fit to play.

Onwards and upwards.

[ahR]

Hmmm...

Never liked Incenzo since he "stole" a job from me. Having said that, thought it was a fair assessment tbh. Not saying Bothroyd was carp just that we may need another striker in the window. Kinda agree with that.

That's about how I see it too...

[MattyRangers]

Bothroyd actually played very well imo. He won every ball up to him and linked with the 2 behind and deeper 3 absolutely brilliantly. He just lacked a bit of sharpness in front of goal and should have scored.

Many might say DJ should play, and the conundrum being, yes he is more likely to have taken the chances, but he wouldn't win the ball in the first place to link up with the runners and start the attacks that led to the chances....

For me we have to stick with this system and team into the next game, assuming traore has only got cramp and is fit to play.

Onwards and upwards.

Every single word, as per my thoughts! Top post Del

[loftlag]

Biggest plank on the airwaves.

Rangers maybe but verbal diorreah from Incenzo.

Yea we didn't take our chances tonight & others got cleared off the line that's football.

I'd be more worried if we never created a chance.

Another poor piece from Incenzo.

Might be a poor piece ,but ufortunatly a truethful piece you can never have enough quality strikers ,Bothroyd isnt quite the prem striker at the moment was a bit lightwieght 1st half better 2nd half but needs muscle up and show a bit more agression in the box but overall put in a descent shift ,then we have DJ, on Him we cant comment yet and thats our lot, HH is not going to be more than a bit part player

[MattyRangers]

Might be a poor piece ,but ufortunatly a truethful piece you can never have enough quality strikers ,Bothroyd isnt quite the prem striker at the moment was a bit lightwieght 1st half better 2nd half but needs muscle up and show a bit more agression in the box but overall put in a descent shift ,then we have DJ, on Him we cant comment yet and thats our lot, HH is not going to be more than a bit part player

You on a wind up? I can see people knocking his finishing but his strength and aerial ability is something surely you cannot knock? Dont remember him losing a single header nor being muscled off the ball once? Very very strong and superb at holding the ball up? Just out of interest, did you go to the game last night?

[Kevster269]

It's hardly news is it? I doubt very much if NW and Co were after Crouch for his defensive skills.
Then again, if Bothroyd hits a hot streak, we'll probably all change our minds

[loftlag]

You on a wind up? I can see people knocking his finishing but his strength and aerial ability is something surely you cannot knock? Dont remember him losing a single header nor being muscled off the ball once? Very very strong and superb at holding the ball up? Just out of interest, did you go to the game last night?

No not on a wind up ,if you think thats knocking Him read it again I agree He won His header yes He controled the ball but for me He didnt show enough agession in and around the box I never saw him challege a defender when the defender had the ball in and around the box a bit of Paul furlong wouldn't go amiss of course I was there otherwise I wouldn't comment its just my opinion

[MattyRangers]

No not on a wind up ,if you think thats knocking Him read it again I agree He won His header yes He controled the ball but for me He didnt show enough agession in and around the box I never saw him challege a defender when the defender had the ball in and around the box a bit of Paul furlong wouldn't go amiss of course I was there otherwise I wouldn't comment its just my opinion

fair enough i suppose i cant really disagree with the agression in and around box comment, did seem to lack that abit. I only opposed to your commment of:

"was a bit lightwieght 1st half better 2nd half but needs muscle up"

because, IMO, he was bl00dy strong yesterday and defiantly doesnt need to "Muscle up" lol

Cheers for response tho pal, civilised convo, unlike some posters who react as though youve just insult their mother and cal you every name under the sun!