Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Good article about our spending + why we could be in trouble.....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • qprjames
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 4353

    #1

    Good article about our spending + why we could be in trouble.....

    he Premier League is an unforgiving arena for newly promoted clubs, but with the campaign still three weeks away fans should be able to look forward with optimism as well as trepidation. That is certainly the mood around Carrow Road and the Liberty Stadium. Norwich City and Swansea City will be among the favourites for relegation, but both have promising managers who are strengthening their teams


    The Premier League is an unforgiving arena for newly promoted clubs, but with the campaign still three weeks away fans should be able to look forward with optimism as well as trepidation.


    This bit interested me..........

    Spending to survive

    How promoted clubs have fared:

    2010-11


    Blackpool (spent £2.5m, relegated)

    Newcastle United (£3m, survived)

    West Bromwich (£5.3m, survived)

    2009-10

    Wolves (spent £16.5m, survived)

    Birmingham City (£17.6m, survived)

    Burnley (£6.6m, relegated)


    How much have we/do we look like spending-zilt.....
    As I've said before being realistic....if we stay up it will be a miracle!
    Now, Then, Forever
    [CENTER]QPR-Football League CHAMPIONS
  • Hoops
    Bronze Seat
    • May 2009
    • 515

    #2
    Sorry James...this link was posted on Saturday morning mate!
    1st Game - QPR v Wolverhampton Wanderers on Tuesday 30th October 1979

    www.twitter.com/ppledgerQPR

    Comment

    • SteveQPR1975
      Silver Seat
      • Apr 2011
      • 2762

      #3
      Just another dig at QPR yawnzz
      R's

      Comment

      • qprted
        CCG
        • May 2010
        • 9639

        #4
        well

        well all this newspaper talk is all very well,but they forget the great brian clough,he proved thats its all about management,and we have in our club the even greater neil warnock

        warnock dosnt have to spend big money,he can drop down to the lower divisions and find brilliant players,like scottish international mackie a player who was purchased for peanuts

        only a bad manager has to spend a fortune on players,when our russian billionaire comes into qpr,we will have a combined total of 36 billion pound
        up against chelseas 8 billion then we can spend for fun,and start winning the prem on a permenant basis
        Click here to view my blog.

        More...

        Comment

        • markarnold
          Apprentice
          • Jan 2010
          • 105

          #5
          Righty oh Ted!!

          Comment

          • Stanley
            Guest
            • Mar 2009
            • 23693

            #6
            Someone should email that to T&C.

            Comment

            • sirpiechucker
              Gold Seat
              • Mar 2009
              • 5079

              #7
              I think the spending money and survival malarky is a myth. It helps of course. But Burnley spent more than WBA and Newcastle did the following season and were still relegated. WHU had a squad full of Premiership players as opposed to Championship players making the step up. They also had England internationals but still got relegated.

              Football and survival is not just about spending money but about luck, it's about consistency, unity and continuity. We could go about and spend millions more than the likes of Wigan, Wolves etc but it doesn't mean a thing if those players get injured, if they lose form and if they are the wrong players for the system you are trying to play.

              Comment

              • stainrodisalegend
                Platinum Seat
                • Mar 2009
                • 13624

                #8
                Originally posted by sirpiechucker
                I think the spending money and survival malarky is a myth. It helps of course. But Burnley spent more than WBA and Newcastle did the following season and were still relegated. WHU had a squad full of Premiership players as opposed to Championship players making the step up. They also had England internationals but still got relegated.

                Football and survival is not just about spending money but about luck, it's about consistency, unity and continuity. We could go about and spend millions more than the likes of Wigan, Wolves etc but it doesn't mean a thing if those players get injured, if they lose form and if they are the wrong players for the system you are trying to play.
                Spending money is not a sufficient conditional for staying up, but it is a necessary one. If QPR were to stay up they would smash all records for surving in the Premier League having spent the lowest amount of money.

                Comment

                • PutneyHoop
                  Apprentice
                  • Jul 2010
                  • 166

                  #9
                  Originally posted by sirpiechucker
                  I think the spending money and survival malarky is a myth. It helps of course. But Burnley spent more than WBA and Newcastle did the following season and were still relegated. WHU had a squad full of Premiership players as opposed to Championship players making the step up. They also had England internationals but still got relegated.

                  Football and survival is not just about spending money but about luck, it's about consistency, unity and continuity. We could go about and spend millions more than the likes of Wigan, Wolves etc but it doesn't mean a thing if those players get injured, if they lose form and if they are the wrong players for the system you are trying to play.
                  Burnley were doing just fine until Bolton turned up and stole Coyle.. They then dug their own grave with the appointment of Brian Laws who had just been released from Wednesday for setting up their relagation season. Laws effectively relagated two clubs in one season!!

                  Comment

                  • Lunar Jetman
                    Silver Seat
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 1380

                    #10
                    I think I'd rather see who they signed rather than how much they spent. This would give a better indication on whether they were equipped for the Premiership or not....

                    You could spend £20 million on a load of old crap that gets you relegated or £5 million on some real nuggets that keep you up.

                    Comment

                    • sirpiechucker
                      Gold Seat
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 5079

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Lunar Jetman
                      I think I'd rather see who they signed rather than how much they spent. This would give a better indication on whether they were equipped for the Premiership or not....

                      You could spend £20 million on a load of old crap that gets you relegated or £5 million on some real nuggets that keep you up.
                      Agreed. The cost of a player often depends on the length of the contract they have with their current club and their age. Charlie Adam had a year left on his contract and went for £9m whereas Carroll had years left on his and went for £35m. Arguably they had very similar impacts on the Championship and on the Premiership.

                      Not a lot of difference in terms of quality between Bothroyd and Graham but because one was in contract and the other wasn't the difference to sign them was £3.5m.

                      Comment

                      • stainrodisalegend
                        Platinum Seat
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 13624

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Lunar Jetman
                        I think I'd rather see who they signed rather than how much they spent. This would give a better indication on whether they were equipped for the Premiership or not....

                        You could spend £20 million on a load of old crap that gets you relegated or £5 million on some real nuggets that keep you up.
                        Agree, but the key word/ figure in your quote is £5m. We look to be spending way, way less than that in transfers (albeit not in wages). You can stay up on a small amount but not on virtually nothing!

                        Comment

                        • waterbuffalo
                          Banned
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 3642

                          #13
                          Originally posted by qprjames
                          he Premier League is an unforgiving arena for newly promoted clubs, but with the campaign still three weeks away fans should be able to look forward with optimism as well as trepidation. That is certainly the mood around Carrow Road and the Liberty Stadium. Norwich City and Swansea City will be among the favourites for relegation, but both have promising managers who are strengthening their teams


                          The Premier League is an unforgiving arena for newly promoted clubs, but with the campaign still three weeks away fans should be able to look forward with optimism as well as trepidation.


                          This bit interested me..........

                          Spending to survive

                          How promoted clubs have fared:

                          2010-11


                          Blackpool (spent £2.5m, relegated)

                          Newcastle United (£3m, survived)

                          West Bromwich (£5.3m, survived)

                          2009-10

                          Wolves (spent £16.5m, survived)

                          Birmingham City (£17.6m, survived)

                          Burnley (£6.6m, relegated)


                          How much have we/do we look like spending-zilt.....
                          As I've said before being realistic....if we stay up it will be a miracle!
                          my god, it took a genius like you to set me straight, what would I have done without your infinite wisdom?

                          Comment

                          • stanistheman
                            Platinum Seat
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 11151

                            #14
                            Newcastle didn't need to spend as most of their squad had plenty of Premiership and even international experience i.e. Harper, Taylor, Enrique, Collocini, Barton Nolan, Guitirerez and I have probably missed out a few more.

                            I agree it is not all about how much a team spends, but quite simply, Warnock can only do so much with a very limited squad.

                            None of the forwards has a pedigree of scoring goals.
                            Helguson misses many sitters at Championship level
                            Agyemang is an awful finisher and often struggles to control the ball.
                            Bothroyd did little of note in his previous Premiership spell and isn't exactly a great goalscorer.
                            Smith (did he score for Portsmouth in the Premiership?)

                            Teams that struggle for goals in the Premiership nearly always get relegated, unless they have a great defence (QPR don't).

                            Comment

                            • PedalR
                              Silver Seat
                              • Dec 2009
                              • 1277

                              #15
                              You must also factor-in the pre-existing financial health of said clubs. A promoted team with little debt can obviously get away with spending more than a promoted team with a big deficit that needs to be addressed before any signings are made.

                              Comment

                              Working...