Rangers in Crouch bid.

[hermonhoop]

Don't fancy him back, but If it means the last option then we have no choices.

[hermonhoop]

My view is that he is overrated.

[BennyBoyRs]

My view is that he is overrated.

A view I share, but he's still more than good enough for us. You are mental to think otherwise.

[Yousef]

A view I share, but he's still more than good enough for us. You are mental to think otherwise.

I prefer buying two young strikers for £6m.

[Stuieang]

My view is that he is overrated.

Name a realistic (not that i think Crouch will sign at all) who is a better signing than Crouch who has scored a ratio of a goal every other game for England, if you remember rightly when he was with us before he was better on the floor than he was in the air with us & has improved ten fold since

[W4 R]

Taarabt is probably going, and the money from that will pay for Crouch. We would then need a quality winger to get crosses in for Crouch. Tommy Smith can cross, not sure about Dyer? If we could get Kyle Walker back on loan, oh well just dreaming!

[Yousef]

Name a realistic (not that i think Crouch will sign at all) who is a better signing than Crouch who has scored a ratio of a goal every other game for England, if you remember rightly when he was with us before he was better on the floor than he was in the air with us & has improved ten fold since

I am not against buying him but not for £6m. At 30, I do not think he is worth more than £2m. I am sure we can get a couple of Spanish/Portuguese strikers at less prices.

[Jase]

My view is that he is overrated.

Personally I've always considered Crouch as underrated. Put it this way, if he was 5'11" instead of 8'3", and ha the same goals to game ratios, he would be rated alongside any English striker of the last 10 years. Unfortunately too iften the ball is pumped to his head (which ironically is probably the worst part of his game), and he looks like Bambi on ice when he runs.

I don't think it will happen in a million years, but Crouch would be a great signing. Anyone who thinks different needs to have a word with themselves.

[Tarbie]

Obviously just paper talk, if Warnock had 6m to spend there is no way he would blow all of it on 1 player!

[QPRacademy]

I actually also don't want Crouchy back.

Would rather we spent the kitty on Clyne , Naughton, DJ, Bullard and keep hold of Adel (or find a young gifted fast playmaker as a replacement- why o why could we have not kept Raheem)

[Tarbie]

Personally I've always considered Crouch as underrated. Put it this way, if he was 5'11" instead of 8'3", and ha the same goals to game ratios, he would be rated alongside any English striker of the last 10 years. Unfortunately too iften the ball is pumped to his head (which ironically is probably the worst part of his game), and he looks like Bambi on ice when he runs.

I don't think it will happen in a million years, but Crouch would be a great signing. Anyone who thinks different needs to have a word with themselves.

[davman]

My view is that you are wrong and could not have seen much of Crouch play.

He is actually not too good in the air as he has never had to jump to win any growing up. Hoof with him up front and no team would do well.

But, be honest, you don't need to be ITK to know that this is (toilet) paper talk.

[paulmqpr]

I am not against buying him but not for £6m. At 30, I do not think he is worth more than £2m. I am sure we can get a couple of Spanish/Portuguese strikers at less prices.

Fu ck off yousef :yush:

[Yousef]

Fu ck off yousef :yush:

Thank you. I am not going to say anything more.

[Jase]

He is actually not too good in the air as he has never had to jump to win any growing up. Hoof with him up front and no team would do well.

or, as we used to call it, the Dichio effect!