Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Ambrose instead of Routledge?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rangersroar
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 1952

    #16
    Originally posted by 80sCasual
    I think it's more of a case of Mackie over Routledge, costs the board nothing and he'll be fit again in August.
    If it's an either or situation as you suggest, what will happen if we get another injury like we did with Mackie ?

    Comment

    • simonQPR
      Apprentice
      • Mar 2009
      • 90

      #17
      also we all hope that Mackie returns back to his best but look what happened to vine after he broke his leg never the same player atleast with routledge we know what we would of got..

      Comment

      • DelTrotter
        Silver Seat
        • Jul 2010
        • 3424

        #18
        If the rumours are true and CMS is on his way, I'd prefer him over WR anyway.

        Comment

        • rangerforevereastcote
          Silver Seat
          • Apr 2011
          • 4144

          #19
          isn t it more a case that routledge has refused the transfer as reported on ssn , so not really got a choice

          Comment

          • SuperHoopNik
            CCG
            • Mar 2011
            • 6660

            #20
            Mackie is better than both of them!
            "When you went to the corner and saw our fans celebrating the way they were you just wanted to be part of it" - Shaun Derry after we beat the scum 1-0

            Comment

            • Stuieang
              Bronze Seat
              • Mar 2009
              • 664

              #21
              Id rather Danns from Palace than ambrose, 7 hes out on contract next week so fits our bill perfectly

              Comment

              Working...