Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Mancienne & harewood

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • geejaybee
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 3377

    #1

    Mancienne & harewood

    According to BBC Teletext, Mancienne is keen on a loan move away from Stamford Bridge as he's desperate for first team football and Harewood is avilable from Aston Villa for £1.5m.for my part I'd love to see Mancienne back in hoops but he might feel he prefers Wolves,as for Harewood,I still think he's a bit pricey.Your thoughts please.
  • Dando
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 1914

    #2
    Would like to see both of them sign, but think its too late to get Mancienne now. Hes made appearances for Chelsea and is making a name for himself. I wouldnt be surprised to see a premiership team snap him up, or one of the top Championship sides at least.

    I think Harewood would do a good job, but not sure hes everyones choice and not convinced hed be a prolific scorer

    Comment

    • Hertford Hoop
      W12 Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 15999

      #3
      2 very good players for us, one tried and tested MM and a monster up front who would score goals in the CCC
      I blew a lot on vodka and tonic, gambling and fags. Looking back, I think I overdid it on the tonic. - The one and only Stanley Bowles

      Comment

      • WeAreQPR12
        C Club
        • Mar 2009
        • 23544

        #4
        I think Harewood would score goals in the championship. I do think he isn't premiership material and I wouldn't pay over 1 million for him. Mancienne could do a job at full back but I would prefer Gunther over MM.
        I played sunday league football today.

        Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.

        I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.

        We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!

        Comment

        • Pyrford Ranger
          Bronze Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 516

          #5
          we have absolutely NO chance of getting Mancienne the blokes an U21 regular and would cost about £3m more than we're prepared to spend. We did have a chance a year or so ago but the "management" didn't rate him apparently ,ho!ho!ho!

          Comment

          • WeAreQPR12
            C Club
            • Mar 2009
            • 23544

            #6
            3 million??? Where did you get that figure from?
            He won't go for that much and more like half that figure.
            Steve Slade was a regular at u21 level so lets not get carried away.
            He is prone to making way to many mistake to be rated at 3 million plus he is only a full back as he is still to lightweight to play in the centre. 11 stone does not make a centre back.
            I played sunday league football today.

            Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.

            I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.

            We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!

            Comment

            • Pyrford Ranger
              Bronze Seat
              • Mar 2009
              • 516

              #7
              Mancienne has consistantly played for England since U16 and is a good player, a comparison to Slade is rather rediculous.

              Comment

              • writtler
                Silver Seat
                • Mar 2009
                • 1001

                #8
                Originally posted by WeAreQPR12
                3 million??? Where did you get that figure from?
                He won't go for that much and more like half that figure.
                Steve Slade was a regular at u21 level so lets not get carried away.
                He is prone to making way to many mistake to be rated at 3 million plus he is only a full back as he is still to lightweight to play in the centre. 11 stone does not make a centre back.

                Slade made 4 appearances for the u-21's in one tournament - hardly a regular.

                Just think we actually gave Spurs 350K for him...
                "Originally Posted by qblockpete
                QPR will finish at least in the Play offs
                Swansea will finish in bottom 6
                Middlesboro will finish champions"

                Comment

                • crowlehoops
                  Bronze Seat
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 722

                  #9
                  mancienne yes, harewood no

                  Comment

                  • stainrodisalegend
                    Platinum Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 13624

                    #10
                    both yes, won't get either

                    Comment

                    • Nodge70

                      #11
                      Gunter wants to go to Forest. May turn us down even if we agree a deal with Spurs.

                      Comment

                      • stainrodisalegend
                        Platinum Seat
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 13624

                        #12
                        Puts our supposed promotion ambitions into perspective if a player wd rather go to a club that v narrowly avoided relegation into the third tier over us.

                        Comment

                        • Bigdave
                          Gold Seat
                          • Apr 2009
                          • 5109

                          #13
                          Would love to see MM back at the Rangers. Dont rate Harewood at all.

                          Comment

                          • qpr_yuley
                            Silver Seat
                            • Apr 2009
                            • 1961

                            #14
                            Not sure we'll actually get either of these as per, but would like to see them come
                            We're Queens Park Rangers, we rule supreme

                            Comment

                            • Dazzer1977
                              W12 Seat
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 4751

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Pyrford Ranger
                              Mancienne has consistantly played for England since U16 and is a good player, a comparison to Slade is rather rediculous.
                              Originally posted by writtler
                              Slade made 4 appearances for the u-21's in one tournament - hardly a regular.

                              Just think we actually gave Spurs 350K for him...

                              Connolly isn't an under 21's player, cost us less and is by far a better player. As too is Gorkss. I'd even go as far as saying Stewpeas has been more consistent and a better player for QPR than M&M was so why even talk about the fella. We had one of the best defenses in the English game last season and our weak area is up front and a ball winning central midfielder. Get those first and then worry about other fringe players!

                              Comment

                              Working...