Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

e-mail from QPR

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • QPROslo
    Silver Seat
    • Dec 2010
    • 1137

    #31
    I read the piece of information from BE and FB as good news. Ignoring the PR crap regarding made up fans statements, the important conclusion is that it looks as if Bernie and Flavio are just after more money. If Mittal's initial price quote, as referred to in media (£50m for Bernies 62% stake, possibly also including Flavios 5% stake, probably only verbally commicated to Bernie) is correct, I understand Bernie is holding out for more. I am confident a second bid will be tabled. In the meantime I think it is vice not to get too distracted by the PR war going on between the two owner groups, where the respective parties try to get supporters on their suide. My support is obviously with the Mittals as I think they will provide more financial support to the club and run it better, but if we end up being owned by Bernie until he finds the right long term owner I can easily live with that. We are Premier League and nothing can ruin my joy of finally being back.

    Comment

    • Connell10
      Silver Seat
      • Mar 2011
      • 3468

      #32
      All this email shows is flabio and the dwarf are getting a bit desperate and are trying spin their way out of a p.r nightmare! The next few weeks are gonna be interesting but not in a good way I think! By the way is there any way to find out who the fans were they spoke to as id love a chat with them!
      LONDON CALLING TO THE ZOMBIES OF DEATH.... ALSO KNOW AS BRENTFORD FANS

      Comment

      • James1979
        Silver Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 4857

        #33
        Originally posted by themodfather
        we are def losing a million £££ a month ( or where as per last accounts)
        why are we losing that amount? it ain't gone on fans.....
        so wages must be up and expenditure.

        fb and bern apparently are paying up...qpr debts are around the £30m mark....if they want £100m is that to clear debts too,in full??

        i can;t recall ishan involved in the faurlin signing nor he saying much on the hearing.
        imo, it's all business chat, probably happens a lot in large companies when there are several parties jostling for control.
        anyone else feel club statements paint an all is wonderful picture?
        as said before IF MR MITTAL WANTED "iN" HE'D DO IT.
        Agree and he should pay market value.

        Comment

        • qprted
          CCG
          • May 2010
          • 9639

          #34
          im not

          i am not the brightest person in the world next to scarlet pimple im the dimmest poster on here but ,it somehow seems to me that there is desperation in this message,could it be that bernie and flav do want out but want more money
          Click here to view my blog.

          More...

          Comment

          • Vish
            Bronze Seat
            • Feb 2010
            • 386

            #35
            Originally posted by James1979
            Agree and he should pay market value.
            i'd expect BE wants over any beyond the market value though.

            Comment

            • stainrodisalegend
              Platinum Seat
              • Mar 2009
              • 13624

              #36
              Originally posted by QPROslo
              I read the piece of information from BE and FB as good news. Ignoring the PR crap regarding made up fans statements, the important conclusion is that it looks as if Bernie and Flavio are just after more money. If Mittal's initial price quote, as referred to in media (£50m for Bernies 62% stake, possibly also including Flavios 5% stake, probably only verbally commicated to Bernie) is correct, I understand Bernie is holding out for more. I am confident a second bid will be tabled. In the meantime I think it is vice not to get too distracted by the PR war going on between the two owner groups, where the respective parties try to get supporters on their suide. My support is obviously with the Mittals as I think they will provide more financial support to the club and run it better, but if we end up being owned by Bernie until he finds the right long term owner I can easily live with that. We are Premier League and nothing can ruin my joy of finally being back.
              A voice of sanity. My advice to fans would be "don't get caught up in the spin operation between both parties."

              The main points I take from the statement are:

              Ecclestone still reckons he might get more money for the club so hasn't closed the door.

              Interesting that the Mitals apparently refused to invest.

              Both sides in my view trying to play fans like a banjo.

              Comment

              • James1979
                Silver Seat
                • Mar 2009
                • 4857

                #37
                Originally posted by stainrodisalegend
                A voice of sanity. My advice to fans would be "don't get caught up in the spin operation between both parties."

                The main points I take from the statement are:

                Ecclestone still reckons he might get more money for the club so hasn't closed the door.

                Interesting that the Mitals apparently refused to invest.

                Both sides in my view trying to play fans like a banjo.
                exactly and people fall for it.

                Comment

                • BUSHRANGER1982
                  Gold Seat
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 5666

                  #38
                  Our club is made to look very silly, far too often for my liking.

                  In my opinion, the board have made a very expensive rod for their own backs.
                  I want real value for my money now, and will not settle for second best all the time, and neither should any other QPR fan.

                  Comment

                  • vblockranger
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 15218

                    #39
                    Originally posted by James1979
                    exactly and people fall for it.
                    not falling for it just think its out of order..

                    Comment

                    • qprted
                      CCG
                      • May 2010
                      • 9639

                      #40
                      yeah

                      yeah i fell for this hook line and sinker,i honestly thought that it was ok to think
                      Click here to view my blog.

                      More...

                      Comment

                      • Stanley
                        Guest
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 23693

                        #41
                        The only forecast I will make is that this is gonna be a LONG thread.

                        Comment

                        • hermitage10
                          Silver Seat
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 2973

                          #42
                          Good value for money??? Well the hell did they find those fans
                          CHAMPIONS
                          Ainsworth is a Legend http://twitter.com/#!/ChrisHermitage Has scored at Loftus Road

                          Comment

                          • DominicIorfa
                            Apprentice
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 5

                            #43
                            I still don't understand why Saksensa get's sacked for his handling of the FA Inquiry in which we got possibly the best result we could have hoped for, yet Paladini was negligent and he's still there!

                            Can anyone explain that one?

                            Comment

                            • vblockranger
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 15218

                              #44
                              Originally posted by DominicIorfa
                              I still don't understand why Saksensa get's sacked for his handling of the FA Inquiry in which we got possibly the best result we could have hoped for, yet Paladini was negligent and he's still there!

                              Can anyone explain that one?
                              Paladini is Briatore's creature ....

                              Comment

                              • Stanley
                                Guest
                                • Mar 2009
                                • 23693

                                #45
                                Saksena's name was never mentioned ONCE throughout the entire Inquiry...before, during and after.

                                Never mentioned in the report, the media, or by the club.

                                Whats more he wasn't even at the club when Faurlin signed.

                                Comment

                                Working...