Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

This is all the Mittal's fault

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jonno
    Apprentice
    • Jan 2010
    • 140

    #16
    Originally posted by Bernie's Barnet
    If Flavio and Bernie are bothered to defend themselves as to their attitude towards fans and their running of the club, let them do it and not you.

    What I'm sure we'd all like to hear is what you think about the ticket pricing policy, about Bhatia's statement and about the findings of the FA Commission and in particluar their comments re Paladini. What you think about the idea of an anti-Flavio and Bernie demonstration and whether you'd take part. You know, the sort of stuff that fans might have an interest in hearing your opinion on.

    To be fair, I'll tell you what I think. I think the club is more danger of being asset stripped than ever before. I think the majority shareholders, as Flavio and Bernie appear to prefer being called, couldn't give a rat's @$$ about the fans or the future health and wellbeing of the club. I think Rangers fans should use every opportunity that presents itself to show their disgust for what is happening and give it as much publicity as possible.

    And I think if GP should be relieved of his duties as soon as is humanly possible. It only took the FA Commission a few days to work out what the majority of fans have known for a long time, that he is out of his depth and is doing more harm than good to the club.

    Over to you.
    Absolutely spot on.

    Comment

    • californiahoop
      Silver Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 4932

      #17
      Originally posted by jonno
      Absolutely spot on.
      It will be interesting to hear from Fab & Bernie
      Kept the faith!

      Comment

      • robloft
        Bronze Seat
        • Apr 2009
        • 780

        #18
        Originally posted by californiahoop
        It will be interesting to hear from Fab & Bernie
        You'll be waiting a long time don't hold your breath !

        Comment

        • march56
          Silver Seat
          • Jan 2011
          • 1275

          #19
          they have got gagging orders, pair of ****s!

          Comment

          • singingranger
            Silver Seat
            • Jul 2009
            • 2056

            #20
            Originally posted by qblockpete
            End of the day Amit is a peoples person.

            Flavio and Bernie put there foots in it and look on everyday fans as purely punters. They treat it simply as a business.

            Would say in their defence, they have put a good percentage of the money and backing this season
            yes Pete as the odds were in our favor to go up as early as september, as at last they saw return on investment after Amit had got us back to a stable platform

            Comment

            • 80sCasual
              CCG
              • Dec 2009
              • 9231

              #21
              This Flav & Bernie are 'Majority shareholders'
              Where do people keep getting Flav from, I thought he had now taken a step back.
              Bernie is the majority shareholder alone followed by Mittal still with 33%, if I am correct.

              Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
              Queens Park Rangers
              NPower Champions 2010/2011

              PREMIER LEAGUE 2011 - ETERNITY (Oh well got that wrong, we'll be back though)

              Comment

              • bhujio
                Bronze Seat
                • Feb 2010
                • 378

                #22
                Originally posted by kron-1664
                Indians dont ever bid a reasonable amount. I have dealt witrh them for long enough to know this.
                Don't make a general assumption.

                How do you think they got where they are, by underpaying for every business they bought into.

                Eccelston has publically quoted he values the club at 100ml.

                Do you think that is a resonable price.

                Blackburn Rovers some what established Prem club was bought for 30ml.

                Do you think Mr Mittal should pay any price asked of them.

                They have top people working for them and knows the value of a club.

                Do you think Mr Mittal underpaid for the house he bought from the same person (Eccelston).

                Comment

                • bhujio
                  Bronze Seat
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 378

                  #23
                  Originally posted by mjenner
                  i understand Ecclestone been putting in £900k a month for the last 2 years to fund what the club loses every month. £35million i would turn that down as well, £100m is too much but £50m min i would say.
                  Amit has resigned because they lost their bid nothing to do with season ticket hike, that's my view anyway.
                  I think it is in the offie it was part of the reason, and posted by the current owners.

                  Comment

                  • stainrodisalegend
                    Platinum Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 13624

                    #24
                    Originally posted by bhujio
                    Don't make a general assumption.

                    How do you think they got where they are, by underpaying for every business they bought into.

                    Eccelston has publically quoted he values the club at 100ml.

                    Do you think that is a resonable price.

                    Blackburn Rovers some what established Prem club was bought for 30ml.

                    Do you think Mr Mittal should pay any price asked of them.

                    They have top people working for them and knows the value of a club.

                    Do you think Mr Mittal underpaid for the house he bought from the same

                    person (Eccelston).

                    Bhuto you are absolutely right to highlight the casual racism on here.

                    Comment

                    • californiahoop
                      Silver Seat
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 4932

                      #25
                      Originally posted by californiahoop
                      What I want to know is why did they allow is to think the Mittals had or where going to take a more active role when in fact 1 1/2 men have been in charge all along.
                      Originally posted by kron-1664
                      Indians dont ever bid a reasonable amount. I have dealt witrh them for long enough to know this.
                      Business men dont bid the asking price, race has nothing to do with it.

                      A good point was made by one of the other posters regarding Blackburn, they paid 30m for an estlablished prem club, the difference is London, QPR could/will be bigger than Blackburn, and if what I gave read is correct, half punt has been bankrolling the club and is well within his rights to ask for more than 35m.

                      So the Mittals should out up or shut up.
                      Kept the faith!

                      Comment

                      • Shania
                        C Club
                        • Apr 2010
                        • 23696

                        #26
                        Originally posted by 80sCasual
                        This Flav & Bernie are 'Majority shareholders'
                        Where do people keep getting Flav from, I thought he had now taken a step back.
                        Bernie is the majority shareholder alone followed by Mittal still with 33%, if I am correct.

                        Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

                        I read somewhere that Briatore in one way or the other can get his percentage of the shares back from Bernie.
                        QPR
                        Best team in the world
                        Sort of

                        Comment

                        • californiahoop
                          Silver Seat
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 4932

                          #27
                          Originally posted by californiahoop
                          What I want to know is why did they allow is to think the Mittals had or where going to take a more active role when in fact 1 1/2 men have been in charge all along.
                          Originally posted by Shania
                          I read somewhere that Briatore in one way or the other can get his percentage of the shares back from Bernie.
                          He probably can but at what price? Bernie is about the dollars!
                          Kept the faith!

                          Comment

                          Working...