Change of subject- I have heard....

[hermitage10]

O'Hara would be a great signing

[kron-1664]

ive heard this one as well(o hara). A few weeks back , didnt think anything of it at the time but he would be a quality addition

[oldhoop]

Has to be a great signing for us.

[keep the faith]

Would be Warnock master stroke AGAIN if we signed him

[Nodge70]

If Wolves stay up, O'Hara signs for them permanently. Part of the current loan deal.

[bushcelt1]

lets hope they drop then

[Fez]

O'Hara is a class player even in the Prem would be a great signing!

[waterbuffalo]

I never said we wouldn't be fine -- just that we won't be in the Champions League -- a big difference.
We used our reserves/fringe players for the cups this season.
Not the same as regular squad rotation for league games.

Your whole tone is very offensive.

what lunatic would entertain the idea that rangers are gonna get into europe?
those teams that play in the champions league have 22 internationals, and 8 reserves. that will never happen to qpr.

so you are saying when managers like mccarthy and coyle rotate (and get criticized for doing so) they should be fined? Look, you know, if Wolves are playing Chelsea on Saturday and West Brom on wednesday, they are likely to rest their players against chelsea so as to have more weapons to take 3 points of west brom? An infant can understand that. Your ignorance is offensive to me.

[stanley75]

If Wolves stay up, O'Hara signs for them permanently. Part of the current loan deal.

Quite - more B/s from "sources". I think I prefer yours Nodge mate. Even if Wolves options do not kick in nothing links him to us.

Last time he had a price attached to his sale from a reasonable source (i.e. not one on here that rhymes with "nuff-now... we've had enough made up shite") it was said to be £8m. That is way off rangers' radar. Very decent player but not a priority position and.... oh ******... why are we talking about it at all?? It is made up stuff! Not even rumour - just made up like the last one from same source.

[singingranger]

Not sure about O hara specifically but I expect us to make 3 big money signings (around the 7/8m) mark along with 4 or 5 freebies on decent wages, but we need to get there first

[Yousef]

Bullard? No thank you.

[silvercue]

O'Hara would be great.

Bridge - no chance with his wages. He isn't worth them anyway. We don't want to create huge wage gulfs in the dressing room. team Spirit (which will be what gets us up) will be shattered in one go.

Bullard - hahahahahahaha - are you all insane. I would rather sign Kevin Keegan right now. he is fitter.

[swanleyhoop]

what lunatic would entertain the idea that rangers are gonna get into europe?
those teams that play in the champions league have 22 internationals, and 8 reserves. that will never happen to qpr.

so you are saying when managers like mccarthy and coyle rotate (and get criticized for doing so) they should be fined? Look, you know, if Wolves are playing Chelsea on Saturday and West Brom on wednesday, they are likely to rest their players against chelsea so as to have more weapons to take 3 points of west brom? An infant can understand that. Your ignorance is offensive to me.

So, someone who has a different opinion to yours, which you back up by quoting me on things I haven't said, is ignorance?
And to then imply that I am less understanding than an infant on that basis is acceptable?
(I personally don't resort to name-calling -- it's usually what people do when the argument is slipping away from them.)

I never said that managers rotating should be fined (just said I didn't like the system) -- and the fact that on the rare occasion when the smaller clubs in the Prem do it, it makes the papers and they face a punishment, proves my argument.
And we will be with those mid-table/lesser teams, not the big 4 or 5 ones. Blackpool did it ONCE -- and were fined. Wolves did it ONCE -- and were fined. So, to suggest that we will walk into the prem and act like the big clubs who do it for egos' sakes and notoriously get away with it, rather than the lesser clubs who don't do it, and don't get away with it when they try to, is way off the mark imho.

That's my last word on it, backed up with facts, rather than misquotes and
insults.
Post whatever you like back. I don't need to say any more, so you'll get no response.

[Jeffro]

Quite - more B/s from "sources". I think I prefer yours Nodge mate. Even if Wolves options do not kick in nothing links him to us.

Last time he had a price attached to his sale from a reasonable source (i.e. not one on here that rhymes with "nuff-now... we've had enough made up shite") it was said to be £8m. That is way off rangers' radar. Very decent player but not a priority position and.... oh ******... why are we talking about it at all?? It is made up stuff! Not even rumour - just made up like the last one from same source.

I see your still getting all girlie over the FA rumour.
Get a life.

[swanleyhoop]

I see your still getting all girlie over the FA rumour.
Get a life.

To be fair to Jeffro on the FA hearing thing -- from what I can make out from various people, the FA wanted the hearing that week (maybe on that day), but the club are taking a long time to submit their evidence, which has delayed the whole thing being sorted -- so Jeffro's source may well have been right in terms of what the FA wanted, but the FA didn't get what they wanted!