Reading v QPR predictions.

[vanhoop]

You lot are ****ing well depressing... Were top of the ****ing league, have some faith...

thank **** they arnt wearing the hoops youve.could you imagine.no ar sehole

[Youvebeenrangered]

You lot are ****ing well depressing... Were top of the ****ing league, have some faith...

[vanhoop]

some of you lot on here are proper embarressing,top of the league and only lost 3.get real reading are there for the taking.failing to prepare is preparing to fail,and were prepared

[Rebel R's]

4-0 reading

And you call me negative,i cant remeber the last time you predicted we would win......we could lose this time but we wont be beaten 4-0 not in a million years,iv gone for a 0-0

[ahR]

There's only ONE R's....

Reading or QPR?

Both are called the r's

Those chumpchops have pinched our nickname... saucy gits...

Would take a draw as we don't usually get much from the Madjeski do we???

U R's...............

[Rebel R's]

this we will win by big score : 0-5

heck why not go for 0-10

[stanistheman]

3-1 Reading. And 1-1 Forest

[qblockpete]

1-0 Reading.

We'll beat Forest though

[rockandroll]

this we will win by big score : 0-5

4-0 reading

[MYU]

1 - 0 win. I wouldnt go by the Pompey game. They were out their to bully us, and not allow us anytime whatsoever on the ball. When we had it at our feet, we did the business. It will be a different game against Reading, and thers no reason why we cant win. We have quality on the field, a good manager, a great bench, and a mixture of experience and new talent. Be positive, we can do it!

Agree and if it's a slow game then we'll never get into it and lose, however if it's a quick game then 2, maybe 3-0 QPR.

I think it will be one the best games this year.

[oldhoop]

2-0 to Reading

[Hertford Hoop]

1-2 Miller double

[kron-1664]

Cant call it, odds back that up although shade the home team slightly, im going for an away win, routledge should get a lot more room and we will break well, longs a doubt as well.

[winalotto]

We will be very dogie, and tight at the back 0-0