Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

BBC London 94.9

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RussRanger
    Unlucky Bloke
    • Apr 2009
    • 4055

    #16
    If Routledge is a Paladini signing it would explain why it was flagged up on this board before being in the public domain.

    Comment

    • James1979
      Silver Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 4857

      #17
      Originally posted by NortholtRanger097
      so nothing of any importance then
      Originally posted by LOOPYHOOP
      People on here love trying to spread some doom and gloom don't they,get a life losers!
      Too bloody right!

      Comment

      • moon_safari
        Silver Seat
        • Jul 2010
        • 1314

        #18
        I'm not doom and gloom far from it, I really like routledge the player, but I'm sorry warnock did not say I want routledge.
        But that's IMHO

        Comment

        • Norths
          CCG
          • Jan 2011
          • 13067

          #19
          Originally posted by moon_safari
          I'm not doom and gloom far from it, I really like routledge the player, but I'm sorry warnock did not say I want routledge.
          But that's IMHO
          Is that speculation or do you know for a fact that warnock doesnt want routledge.

          Comment

          • BennyBoyRs
            I like 'Lone' time
            • Mar 2009
            • 13695

            #20
            I still maintain that any signing is a Warnock signing. GP may well offer these to him, but I'd bet money on it that if NW said he wasn't interested, the player wouldn't be signed.

            Same as with 'Arry at Spuds. He was told VDV was a possibility, and the main man wanted the deal to be done.

            I can't see what's wrong with that.
            Your mum would love me...

            Comment

            • LOOPYHOOP
              Silver Seat
              • Apr 2009
              • 1694

              #21
              Not singling you out moon,just saying I get fed up with some utter tools on here,trying to turn positives in to negatives all the time,I think they need their heads checked.......

              Comment

              • scottyboy007
                Apprentice
                • Mar 2009
                • 247

                #22
                Originally posted by BennyBoyRs
                I still maintain that any signing is a Warnock signing. GP may well offer these to him, but I'd bet money on it that if NW said he wasn't interested, the player wouldn't be signed.

                Same as with 'Arry at Spuds. He was told VDV was a possibility, and the main man wanted the deal to be done.

                I can't see what's wrong with that.
                OI you just stolen exactly what I was going to post, by the time I had logged in you have covered my post word for word - how strange
                The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.

                Comment

                • MYU
                  Administrator
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 43466

                  #23
                  Originally posted by moon_safari
                  I'm not doom and gloom far from it, I really like routledge the player, but I'm sorry warnock did not say I want routledge.
                  But that's IMHO
                  In that case Warnock will come out with it sooner rather than later.

                  I can't see Bernie allowing anyone other than Warnock to say who is coming in... I can't see this.

                  If what you say is true then we as a club will never move forwards and until Neil Warnock says so, i'll take with a pinch of salt.

                  We are a club heading in the right direction, let's keep it that way!

                  Comment

                  • Norths
                    CCG
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 13067

                    #24
                    Originally posted by BennyBoyRs
                    I still maintain that any signing is a Warnock signing. GP may well offer these to him, but I'd bet money on it that if NW said he wasn't interested, the player wouldn't be signed.

                    Same as with 'Arry at Spuds. He was told VDV was a possibility, and the main man wanted the deal to be done.

                    I can't see what's wrong with that.
                    I Agree

                    Comment

                    • moon_safari
                      Silver Seat
                      • Jul 2010
                      • 1314

                      #25
                      Originally posted by LOOPYHOOP
                      Not singling you out moon,just saying I get fed up with some utter tools on here,trying to turn positives in to negatives all the time,I think they need their heads checked.......
                      Mate getting wr is a positive but as benny said was offered him not asked for him.

                      Comment

                      • scottyboy007
                        Apprentice
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 247

                        #26
                        Originally posted by moon_safari
                        Mate getting wr is a positive but as benny said was offered him not asked for him.
                        Maybe - but I sure NW would have jumped at the chance to get Wayne back...

                        ......... I dont understand the problem!
                        The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.

                        Comment

                        • BennyBoyRs
                          I like 'Lone' time
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 13695

                          #27
                          Originally posted by moon_safari
                          Mate getting wr is a positive but as benny said was offered him not asked for him.
                          But surely this is still a Warnock signing? He's the one who gives the go ahead.

                          I think it's a massive plus that we've signed Wayne in the absence of Mackie.
                          Your mum would love me...

                          Comment

                          • G.T.P

                            #28
                            im just gutted we aint in a fa cup replay like cardiff are tonight. extra time coming up any mintue as well.
                            would of loved that tonight. (not)

                            Comment

                            • James1979
                              Silver Seat
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 4857

                              #29
                              Moon, there's a difference between a player being suggested to warnock than players being purchased that he doesn't want. The blokes on the radio were saying that squad is made up of players that warnock didn't want. If he didn't want clarke, why does he play him? Who else are they on about? It annoys me as we're top, things are good and then people like that just talk complete rubbish. I remember the main guy slating adel last year.....what a good judge of a player!!

                              Comment

                              • Loneranger80
                                Silver Seat
                                • Mar 2009
                                • 1899

                                #30
                                so..... why do London 94.9 think Routledge won't be announced within next 24 hours?

                                Comment

                                Working...