Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

"Foul and abusive language"

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Godfather
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 2367

    #1

    "Foul and abusive language"

    Just after the sending off I got a text from the club which said "Orr sent off for foul and abusive language"..?? Mistake surely?
  • wicksta
    Silver Seat
    • Apr 2009
    • 1149

    #2
    Originally posted by The Godfather
    Just after the sending off I got a text from the club which said "Orr sent off for foul and abusive language"..?? Mistake surely?
    It said that on Sky Sports News as well, saw it on the small TV above C block.

    Comment

    • sirstanley
      Apprentice
      • Sep 2009
      • 167

      #3
      The BBC 94.9 coms also stated Foul and abusive too...I think its correct
      Мы Куинз Парк Рейнджерс лучшие команды в Англии!

      Comment

      • The Godfather
        Silver Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 2367

        #4
        I'm confused as the QPR Official report states "Orr was dismissed for a challenge on Hal Robson-Kanu".

        Comment

        • sirstanley
          Apprentice
          • Sep 2009
          • 167

          #5
          It was the utter horrible challenge and Language combined me thinks.
          Мы Куинз Парк Рейнджерс лучшие команды в Англии!

          Comment

          • Stanley
            Guest
            • Mar 2009
            • 23693

            #6
            double yellow for both offences?

            Comment

            • G.T.P

              #7
              think he was yellowing him and then he called him all the names under the sun so he redded him instead.

              Comment

              • sirstanley
                Apprentice
                • Sep 2009
                • 167

                #8
                Originally posted by Stanley76
                double yellow for both offences?
                Totally agree
                Мы Куинз Парк Рейнджерс лучшие команды в Англии!

                Comment

                • stainrodisalegend
                  Platinum Seat
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 13624

                  #9
                  If so he should be fined because that is a really spastic way to be sent off. If a player gets sent off for hand ball on the line, fair enough, but swearing is just ill-discipline and I hope Warnock wont stand for that. Before I heard about the language issue I felt a bit sorry for him as Jamie Mackie - who had another poor game when playing up front, though did really well later at right back - really left him exposed with some clumsy play.

                  Comment

                  • sirstanley
                    Apprentice
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 167

                    #10
                    Originally posted by stainrodisalegend
                    If so he should be fined because that is a really spastic way to be sent off. If a player gets sent off for hand ball on the line, fair enough, but swearing is just ill-discipline and I hope Warnock wont stand for that. Before I heard about the language issue I felt a bit sorry for him as Jamie Mackie - who had another poor game when playing up front, though did really well later at right back - really left him exposed with some clumsy play.

                    You are also overlooking a pathetic Challenge there is no room in the game for that!!
                    Мы Куинз Парк Рейнджерс лучшие команды в Англии!

                    Comment

                    • G.T.P

                      #11
                      and foul language to the ref is dissent, as gutting as it is, it was a deserved red card when you put it all together.

                      Comment

                      • QPR DEVON
                        Bronze Seat
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 373

                        #12
                        tackle was barely a yellow seeing it on sky sports, howards on tarrabt for penalty was worse

                        Comment

                        • G.T.P

                          #13

                          didnt look like he said a word to the ref. cant of been anything to do with dissent/language.

                          Comment

                          • W6hoops

                            #14
                            Yeh, Someone told me at HT about that. Is that a 3 game ban or just 1 game.?

                            Comment

                            • qblockpete
                              C Club
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 22186

                              #15
                              Straight red is 3 games.

                              Orr didn't say a word, so not for dissent.

                              It was a nasty challenge, obvioulsy not mean't but he went over the top.
                              ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
                              THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

                              Comment

                              Working...