Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

If Vine Does Well At Hull City

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bigears
    Bronze Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 963

    #16
    I liked the old Vine, but I think coming back from that seroius injury something has changed in his attiude, i think he is more bitter and thinks someone owes him something.

    Remember NW gave everyone there second chance, both FH and HH took that chance and both have not looked back, while even though Dave i think will still move on he is still involved, were as RV is nowhere to been seen. I think he should have look at Beckem as he was sent to train with the kids at Real Marid by Capello, he didnt moan, worked harder, worked with the kids, taught them and used himself as an example. The result was he got back in the 1st team and won the league for them, this RV did not do just sulked and kicked off.

    For me, this is the reason why all bridges have been burnt with NW and why i think he will be kept well away from the 1st team regardless of what he does.
    One for all.... and all for one

    Comment

    • paulmason
      Banned
      • Mar 2009
      • 7443

      #17
      Originally posted by qblockpete
      Would you have him back in the squa next month?
      This time last year, everyone would have voted no if there was a poll for HH, but now .............

      Comment

      • Stanley
        Guest
        • Mar 2009
        • 23693

        #18
        Simple answer: If Warno deems him good enough to bring back then yes without a doubt. Who are any of us to question his decisions to date? If Vine does recaptures his former fitness and form at Hull then yes, why not.

        Comment

        • G.T.P

          #19
          could everybody stop moving backwards. lets move forward like we are doing.
          do you lot really want the likes of vine, rowly and cook to take us to mid to bottom table mediocrity again or what?

          Comment

          • Ric-Roc

            #20
            Originally posted by paulmason
            This time last year, everyone would have voted no if there was a poll for HH, but now .............
            For one Paul that has already been mentioned & two its a non argument anyway, yes this time last year we were subjected to HH missing chance after chance & generally looking like he doesn't want to be here it was NEVER about his attitude. Vine on the other hand resembles a petulant child, a big time Charlie & comes across as a disruptive influence that's why he's not in the frame for a return imo. All credit to HH he got his nut down & is now reaping the rewards.

            Comment

            • paulmason
              Banned
              • Mar 2009
              • 7443

              #21
              Originally posted by Ric-Roc
              Vine on the other hand resembles a petulant child, a big time Charlie & comes across as a disruptive influence that's why he's not in the frame for a return imo.
              1) I dont read an entire thread before i decide what post to respond to and 2) Taarabt fitted that bill and look at the way he started the season, so people can change,

              Comment

              • Cookiemonster17
                Bronze Seat
                • Mar 2009
                • 475

                #22
                I voted wait until the new year, but I cant see him doing well tbh I .fear his career at this level is over

                Comment

                • Ric-Roc

                  #23
                  Originally posted by paulmason
                  Taarabt fitted that bill and look at the way he started the season, so people can change,
                  Yea fair point.

                  Difference is I would say is we all know what frightening potential Taarabt had / has so he was always worth the risk, Vine? Na. At this point 6 out of 10 Rangers fans wouldn't him back says a lot also.

                  Comment

                  • RussRanger
                    Unlucky Bloke
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 4055

                    #24
                    I voted no. Simply because even if he recovers some form, I think we have adequate striking options and he is surplus to requirements. That's the footballing reason.

                    Also, on a personal level, not happy about his apparent attitude problem.

                    Comment

                    Working...