Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Spurs Van der vaart signing

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • W12hoops
    Silver Seat
    • Feb 2010
    • 3019

    #1

    Spurs Van der vaart signing

    Why was spurs allowed to sign him from madrid 1:september and we might loose our signings because they where 5 or 10 minutes late?
    pathetic IMO
  • oldhoop
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 3467

    #2
    But we won't lose our signings! Its only the negs on here thinking we will!!!
    oldhoop

    The Bread Mans Blue and White Army

    Comment

    • W12hoops
      Silver Seat
      • Feb 2010
      • 3019

      #3
      Originally posted by oldhoop
      But we won't lose our signings! Its only the negs on here thinking we will!!!
      Hope you're right think positive!

      Comment

      • Tarbie
        Gold Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 8542

        #4
        Originally posted by oldhoop
        But we won't lose our signings! Its only the negs on here thinking we will!!!
        Totally right........worst case scenario is we will have to loan them until January then make the signings permanent in the the next transfer window.

        Don't get me wrong, the club have messed up if they have publicly stated they have made both signings and then not got the paperwork completed in time but it really is not the end of the world!

        Comment

        • JudoRanger
          Bronze Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 720

          #5
          The point is, if we have to loan them we can only loan them for 3 months (or 93 days). So that means they miss december with us.
          Queens Park Rangers Til I Die!

          Comment

          • G.T.P

            #6
            please stop this. its standard procedure to take till wednesday to anounce the late ones as official.
            they will be anounced as full queens park rangers players tomorrow, if i read the word loan one more time im gonna start self harming i swear it.

            Comment

            Working...