Is it just me that thought cook was good?

[Dando]

I keep reading a few comments here and there that cook was poor when he came on against Bristol City. I thought he came on and looked impressive in the short spell. Did i miss something?

[ScottJones]

To be honest, I thought he went missing for the first 10 minutes. I sit at the front of R block so maybe I didnt see what he contributed as well as i could have done?

[Minty]

I also thought Cook was pretty poor when he came on. Given he'd been out for a couple of matches and came on as a sub, I suppose we have to give him some leniency. But I think we all agree that he's nowhere near the player he was before he left us :cry:

[ScottJones]

It's a shame as well :very_sad:

[QPRMendoza]

Without a doubt Cook WAS good. It is often a problem coming back after serious injuries to exhibit the speed and confidence that they might have had prior to their injury. I sincerely hope he gets back to his best but am to be quite honest a little bit doubtful. :(

[Minty]

Without a doubt Cook WAS good. It is often a problem coming back after serious injuries to exhibit the speed and confidence that they might have had prior to their injury. I sincerely hope he gets back to his best but am to be quite honest a little bit doubtful. :(

Do you think that's down to a physical change or a mental one?

[thefatgod1]

Cook was poor when he came on and was at fault for there goal, but he did make amends with a contribution to the winner.
Shame he looks like he will never be as he was before he left for fulham

[QPRMendoza]

Do you think that's down to a physical change or a mental one?

I think with injuries such as this it is a mix of both. Generally one aspect influences the other and vice versa. IMO.

[stainrodisalegend]

Yep, you missed something...:waaaht:

[bpr11]

Cook was poor when he came on and was at fault for there goal, but he did make amends with a contribution to the winner.
Shame he looks like he will never be as he was before he left for fulham

From where I was sitting their goal was almost completely Helgusons fault with a weak pass back that Sproule latched onto. i think it would be harsh to blame Cookie for that......

[Dazzer1977]

In answer to you question he did ok. Wouldn't say he set the world on fire. I just don't think he is half the player he was. He seems a lot slowers now and he also looks like he'll struggle to beat an egg at the minute let alone a defender on the opporsite side!

However I do feel that he will be a different and better player than we are seeing now at the start of next season.

[Youvebeenrangered]

Thought cook did alright when he came on. Although for me, going on current form, cook wouldnt get in my midfield 4 or 5. Ofcourse it depends on what formation were playing.

If its a 4 man midfield id go: RM: Ephraim CM: Leigerwood CM: Lopez LM: Taarabt.

If 5: RM: Routledge CM: Leigerwood CM: Lopez CM/AM: Ephraim LM: Taarabt.

[Morris]

Done well IMO, deffo not his fault about their goal, despite what some would try and make you beleive.

[qprjames]

I thaught he did just ok when he was on. Then again it was only 10 minutes!!

[WeAreQPR09]

Judging a player on 10mins play is very very harsh and you cookie slaters should have a reality check. Cookie is not playing as well as he used to but he is still 1 of the better players out of a bad bunch. You put Buzz and Vine in and you will see an improved cookie. If he can stay fit and have a run of games he will come good and lets not forget that Tarrabat will NOT be a QPR player next season