Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Derbyshire and McLean

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stanley75
    Silver Seat
    • Sep 2009
    • 1499

    #16
    Alright smarty pants. I clearly can't see red writing. Or I can't see red writing clearly. Anyway I am now on Benny's side.

    Comment

    • DelTrotter
      Silver Seat
      • Jul 2010
      • 3424

      #17
      Missed it aswell. Would love us to sign him though

      Comment

      • RLHoop
        Bronze Seat
        • Apr 2009
        • 370

        #18
        Originally posted by stanley75
        Alright smarty pants. I clearly can't see red writing. Or I can't see red writing clearly. Anyway I am now on Benny's side.


        :kiss:

        Comment

        • Ric-Roc

          #19
          Maclean would be a great signing, strong as an ox & knows how to find the net. Why are we not going for these inexpensive players??!!! Annoying.

          Comment

          • Youvebeenrangered
            CCG
            • Mar 2009
            • 7293

            #20
            Either would be good.
            Cant believe it, ive been PWOPER MUGGED ORF...

            Comment

            • WeAreQPR12
              C Club
              • Mar 2009
              • 23545

              #21
              Originally posted by Ric-Roc
              Maclean would be a great signing, strong as an ox & knows how to find the net. Why are we not going for these inexpensive players??!!! Annoying.
              Would he be inexpensive though?

              I would expect Peterborough would want at least 1 million for him and that is more than we have yet to spend.

              He might be cheaper I guess it depends how many years he has left on his contract.
              I played sunday league football today.

              Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.

              I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.

              We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!

              Comment

              • Jeffro
                Gold Seat
                • Mar 2010
                • 5360

                #22
                Its a fee for a striker WEARE, puts us out the running unfortunately!

                Comment

                • WeAreQPR12
                  C Club
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 23545

                  #23
                  Very true.

                  If we ment business we would be looking at either scotland or Derbyshire although looking at our squad we could do with both.

                  I am on holiday for 2 weeks so will miss the 1st 2 games of the season.

                  If we start with Helguson then I don't expect to see us score many goals.

                  It will also make me think about is it worth watching a strike force, that should be gracing a league 1/2 fixture.
                  I played sunday league football today.

                  Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.

                  I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.

                  We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!

                  Comment

                  • DelTrotter
                    Silver Seat
                    • Jul 2010
                    • 3424

                    #24
                    Mcleans only 5"6, not a warnock player

                    Comment

                    • WeAreQPR12
                      C Club
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 23545

                      #25
                      Originally posted by DelTrotter
                      Mcleans only 5"6, not a warnock player
                      True and + he would cost money so not an amit player either!
                      I played sunday league football today.

                      Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.

                      I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.

                      We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!

                      Comment

                      • BennyBoyRs
                        I like 'Lone' time
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 13695

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Jeffro
                        Its a fee for a striker WEARE, puts us out the running unfortunately!
                        Please revert to the list from earlier, to name a few.

                        Myth.
                        Your mum would love me...

                        Comment

                        • Ric-Roc

                          #27
                          Originally posted by WeAreQPR12
                          Would he be inexpensive though?

                          I would expect Peterborough would want at least 1 million for him and that is more than we have yet to spend.

                          He might be cheaper I guess it depends how many years he has left on his contract.
                          Yea true but a million is peanuts for a decent strong front man-if its true that we 'allegedly' bid £1.5M for Mcanuff why not a mill for a striker that we are crying out for. Very strange decisions at the top...

                          Comment

                          • singingranger
                            Silver Seat
                            • Jul 2009
                            • 2056

                            #28
                            your such a weirdo w12 so you think mcnuff and adel would cost under 1m! doooh!

                            cookie cost 1m, so did connolly, faurlin cost more !!!

                            dooooh

                            Comment

                            Working...