Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Palace REALLY are desperate

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eagle
    Bronze Seat
    • Apr 2010
    • 325

    #31
    Originally posted by WeAreQPR12
    Eagle I don't think Burley is a bad manager. Just give him a chance and try and forget about warnock, I am sure time will be the best healer mate.
    I'll take Burley thanks.

    His passing style looks great on the eye, and I look forward to seeing Palace play passing football.

    Warnock's football is equally effective; but it has a habit of making the eyes bleed.

    Comment

    • Magic
      Silver Seat
      • Aug 2009
      • 4736

      #32
      zzzzz

      We had attractive footy under De Canio, and we all loved him but didn't get us anywhere in the end.

      Comment

      • Bluehoop
        Gold Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 9258

        #33
        Originally posted by Eagle
        I'll take Burley thanks.

        His passing style looks great on the eye, and I look forward to seeing Palace play passing football.

        Warnock's football is equally effective; but it has a habit of making the eyes bleed.
        In the same way we passed you to death at shitehurst park last season under Warnock
        #standuptocancer
        #inyourfacecancer

        Comment

        • kingo
          Silver Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 1686

          #34
          Originally posted by Eagle
          I'll take Burley thanks.

          His passing style looks great on the eye, and I look forward to seeing Palace play passing football.

          Warnock's football is equally effective; but it has a habit of making the eyes bleed.
          Probably to do with the players he has at his disposal, but NW hasn't resorted to Hoofball with us. In fact the complete opposite it is on the ground and via Faurlin and Buzsaky.
          Last edited by kingo; 26-07-2010, 02:01 PM.
          RIP: Doug, Sniffer and Pat

          Comment

          • Eagle
            Bronze Seat
            • Apr 2010
            • 325

            #35
            Originally posted by kingo
            Probably to do with the players he has at his disposal, but NW hasn't resorted to Hoofball with us. In fact the complete opposite it is on the ground and via Faurlin and Busacky.
            Because you didn't have the players to use his system?

            You now do, in Derry and Hill

            Comment

            • Eagle
              Bronze Seat
              • Apr 2010
              • 325

              #36
              Originally posted by Magic
              zzzzz

              We had attractive footy under De Canio, and we all loved him but didn't get us anywhere in the end.
              Burley has a good record of promotion, while playing good football.

              E.g. Ipswich.

              Comment

              • Eagle
                Bronze Seat
                • Apr 2010
                • 325

                #37
                Originally posted by Bluehoop
                In the same way we passed you to death at shitehurst park last season under Warnock
                You did indeed. We really were **** that day.

                However, you now have our two worst players on that day!

                Comment

                • Eagle
                  Bronze Seat
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 325

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Bluehoop
                  In the same way we passed you to death at shitehurst park last season under Warnock
                  You've also lost Tarabbt, your best player.

                  And also Simpson.

                  And your second goal wouldn't have counted with competent officials

                  Comment

                  • Magic
                    Silver Seat
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 4736

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Eagle
                    Burley has a good record of promotion, while playing good football.

                    E.g. Ipswich.
                    Presumably he had £ at Ipswich

                    Comment

                    • Eagle
                      Bronze Seat
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 325

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Magic
                      Presumably he had £ at Ipswich
                      As hilarious as that was, we've got £ at Palace.

                      Hence why we're apparently set to sign Garvan for £350k. A great signing for that price.

                      Comment

                      • kingo
                        Silver Seat
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 1686

                        #41
                        Originally posted by Eagle
                        Because you didn't have the players to use his system?

                        You now do, in Derry and Hill
                        So he is going to turn them into forwards to lump it up too ? Derry is there to give Buz and Faurlin the freedom to go forward and it has worked in pre season.
                        RIP: Doug, Sniffer and Pat

                        Comment

                        • Hertford Hoop
                          W12 Seat
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 15998

                          #42
                          Originally posted by Eagle
                          You did indeed. We really were **** that day.

                          However, you now have our two worst players on that day!
                          Nah, you haven't got any left or certainly won't have any left soon
                          I blew a lot on vodka and tonic, gambling and fags. Looking back, I think I overdid it on the tonic. - The one and only Stanley Bowles

                          Comment

                          • Magic
                            Silver Seat
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 4736

                            #43
                            Originally posted by Eagle
                            As hilarious as that was, we've got £ at Palace.

                            Hence why we're apparently set to sign Garvan for £350k. A great signing for that price.


                            No, no please stop, my aching sides

                            Comment

                            • Eagle
                              Bronze Seat
                              • Apr 2010
                              • 325

                              #44
                              Originally posted by Cambs Hoops
                              Nah, you haven't got any left or certainly won't have any left soon
                              Of course, right you are.

                              I have completely forgotten that we have lost Butterfield, Derry, Hill and Ertl and have replaced them with Dorman, Garvan, Barrett, Wright, and a new trialist who looked very impressive.

                              Also, we're set to bring in 5/6 more players immediately after our exit from Administration is formalized.

                              Our squad will be bigger by about 5 players than it was last season, and also a lot better.

                              Comment

                              • Eagle
                                Bronze Seat
                                • Apr 2010
                                • 325

                                #45
                                Originally posted by Magic


                                No, no please stop, my aching sides
                                Are you serious?

                                Ipswich fans can't understand why they've let Garvan (or Wright) go?

                                Comment

                                Working...