Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Warnock: We need strikers

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MYU
    Administrator
    • Mar 2009
    • 43466

    #1

    Warnock: We need strikers

    Gaffer on Bluebirds defeat at Loftus Road

    More...
  • Shania
    C Club
    • Apr 2010
    • 23695

    #2
    But he still got the job on the terms offered him I reckon. Why dont he use Bent or Grman.

    My message: Stop complaining and you just get on with it,please!!
    QPR
    Best team in the world
    Sort of

    Comment

    • Shania
      C Club
      • Apr 2010
      • 23695

      #3
      But he still took the job on the terms offered him I reckon. Why doesnt he make use of Bent or German??

      My message: Stop complaining and get on with it,please!!
      QPR
      Best team in the world
      Sort of

      Comment

      • Magic
        Silver Seat
        • Aug 2009
        • 4736

        #4
        Strikers? We don't need them we have Priskin, Bent, and Helguson to come back. They are all top quality

        What we need are a few more midfielders!

        Comment

        • Shania
          C Club
          • Apr 2010
          • 23695

          #5
          Originally posted by Magic
          Strikers? We don't need them we have Priskin, Bent, and Helguson to come back. They are all top quality

          What we need are a few more midfielders!



          I was thinking of this season. Why not use German and Bent . When Priskin and (Simpson at the moment!) isent up to it.

          Can Bent really be any worse than Priskin...
          QPR
          Best team in the world
          Sort of

          Comment

          • geejaybee
            Silver Seat
            • Mar 2009
            • 3377

            #6
            Either Priskin has a clause in his contract that insists he plays 89 minutes in every game,or he is Warnock's love child or Neil has a liking for Priskin that is bordering on being unhealthy.What other explanation could there be ?And why weren't the substitutes brought on with a lot more than 8 minutes left on the clock?We dominated the game from start to finish.I lie,there was no finish - thats been our problem for months - WE CAN'T FINISH.

            Comment

            • Shania
              C Club
              • Apr 2010
              • 23695

              #7
              Originally posted by geejaybee
              Either Priskin has a clause in his contract that insists he plays 89 minutes in every game,or he is Warnock's love child or Neil has a liking for Priskin that is bordering on being unhealthy.What other explanation could there be ?And why weren't the substitutes brought on with a lot more than 8 minutes left on the clock?We dominated the game from start to finish.I lie,there was no finish - thats been our problem for months - WE CAN'T FINISH.


              I did also react to the fact that he waited to long with his subs today.

              Regarding Priskin I think you are right.
              QPR
              Best team in the world
              Sort of

              Comment

              • Magic
                Silver Seat
                • Aug 2009
                • 4736

                #8
                Definately should've changed it before we went behind.

                Comment

                • hermitage10
                  Silver Seat
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 2973

                  #9
                  We need to tell priskin to f off n to make subs much earlier
                  CHAMPIONS
                  Ainsworth is a Legend http://twitter.com/#!/ChrisHermitage Has scored at Loftus Road

                  Comment

                  Working...