Tosic

[Stanley]

I think Palace were expecting to attack us down that side -- seemed part of their game plan to exploit Hill.
Must have been a hell of a shock to find Tosic there instead.
That's probably why they resorted to route one, with Gorkss beating their striker to everything in the air.

That plus losing Calvin Andrew after 15 seconds, or as good as.

[BuzsakyIsGod]

if you mean looks then no comment but otherwise yes looked a decent player and better than what we have got.

I didn't mean that jesus I meant to say he played quite well. I realise now I should have worded it a bit better

[swanleyhoop]

Just wasn't their day, was it?

[qpr]

That's the thinking behind it. He was signed with a view to a permanent.

Exactly, hence why i said it

[Stanley]

I emphasised the point because certain posters didnt see the sense in us signing him.

Hopefully after today they'll understand.

[qblockpete]

If we sign him permanantly then fair enough.

Still don't think we will.

Would admit he was far superior to HILL and played very well

[Stanley]

If we sign him permanantly then fair enough.

Still don't think we will.

Would admit he was far superior to HILL and played very well

What makes you think we wont sign him permanently, Pete?

Warnock has stated specifically that since he came in, all signings will be permanent or with a view to being permanent.

[qblockpete]

problem is we hang on his every word, sure it was in reference to another target (target man he wanted).

Happy to be proved wrong, thought Tosic was excellent