There is a point to all this. The circumstances behind Priskin's signing are of course pre takeover by Mittal & Co, and one might assume that if indeed we procured the guy on condition he starts every game he's fit for, then so be it. Poor judgment, but maybe circumstances and a bit of panic prevailed.
A question has been asked about the terms of his contract, and Pete has provided a categoric answer very quickly thereafter. Now either he is telling the truth, in which case I think it's not unreasonable to ask where he is obtaining this info from, or he is lying, in which case I think it's not unreasonable to ask what his motives are.
If he has become privy to information about Priskin's contract, then there is a leak somewhere which is not necessarily working in the best interests of the club. And at the end of the day, the best interests of the club should be the most important consideration for all fans of QPR.
So I'd still like Pete to answer my question. But I have to admit, I'm not holding my breath.
A question has been asked about the terms of his contract, and Pete has provided a categoric answer very quickly thereafter. Now either he is telling the truth, in which case I think it's not unreasonable to ask where he is obtaining this info from, or he is lying, in which case I think it's not unreasonable to ask what his motives are.
If he has become privy to information about Priskin's contract, then there is a leak somewhere which is not necessarily working in the best interests of the club. And at the end of the day, the best interests of the club should be the most important consideration for all fans of QPR.
So I'd still like Pete to answer my question. But I have to admit, I'm not holding my breath.
Comment