Suggestion for the board owners

[AndyB]

Who said that?

[writtler]

Its because of the trouble makers, I get the stick.

Very close, very close to getting rid of the few

There were a lot less arguments and the ones that did occur never lasted so long when HA9 was banned - FACT.

[Receed R]

i wish i had access to the delete user function as some on here would be gone a long time ago

[Receed R]

There were a lot less arguments and the ones that did occur never lasted so long when HA9 was banned - FACT.

Writtler all i ever see you talk about is gp and slagging pete off, i disagree that i am the cause of this, its you and your buddies spouting incorrect accusations yet when confronted u cant produce the evidence, says it all really

[The Merry Ploughboy]

There were a lot less arguments and the ones that did occur never lasted so long when HA9 was banned - FACT.

what he said is the truth,however as he is now drinking buddies with the owners he is deemed "untouchable".If HA9 WAS Anti-Paladini he would have gone ages ago FACT 109.56% CURRY SAUCE

[The Merry Ploughboy]

the invasion has started yet again tonight

myu / pete you chaps own this site please do away with these trouble makers as they are ruining this board

ruining the board.look in the mirror james and go back to farmville

[James1979]

Who's job did pete cost?

[Receed R]

ruining the board.look in the mirror james and go back to farmville

im on level 35 now, great game but very time consuming

Do u play it and if so would u like to be my neighboor

[writtler]

Writtler all i ever see you talk about is gp and slagging pete off, i disagree that i am the cause of this, its you and your buddies spouting incorrect accusations yet when confronted u cant produce the evidence, says it all really

ok Mr Smartarse - name me one accusation I have made and been asked to provide evidence on?

As for slagging Pete off - I may disagree with him as he does with I, does that really constitute slagging off?

You sir and just **** stirring once again and are the true troublemaker on this board IMO of course.

[terry ball]

6 hours now and still the original thread not reopened

I honestly thought the messageboard owners would of done the right thing, not show prejudice and let people see exactly what I posted.

No wonder some see this as a pro paladini board (owner wise not poster) when they are willing to drag fellow Qpr fans name through the mud to protect their sugar daddy.

Disapointing and discusting. You should be ashamed of yourselves

[Receed R]

terry

Any danger of seeing your evidence?

Cheers

[Sharpy]

And yet another thread,going the way of many others.

I for the life of me cannot see any reason not to discuss anything what so ever,to do with those members of our current board,and thier actions regarding the buying and selling of players,no matter who they are.
Debate about previous regimes,and thier figure heads are easy targets for some fans,but one mans name is mentioned and the veil of secrecy is raised,to a point where Pete would rather ban,and in my opinion lose some valued contributers to this board,to protect some sort of alligance.

James.

If you have nothing to contribute,keep sctum.

[qblockpete]

Terry ball, not sure why you want them revisited?

http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/forum/showthread.php?t=46697&highlight=transfers

Give me a minute and I'll find the other one

[qblockpete]

Cannot really bring the other post back up.

its not terry ball or w12 ranger, but brown envelopes are discussed, could be libelous.

[Receed R]

any idea what the outcome of the audit was or was that more falsified accusations?