An agenda-less and straightforward question for all genuine QPR supporters

[Stanley]

Trying to answer honestly, putting all loyalties and self-interests to one side, and the interests of the club as paramount:

If some rumours are to be believed that a certain Mr Gianni Paladini is in fact the individual responsible for the divulgence of private and confidential information from QPR FC to interested third parties, is this or is this not the type of practice which would be in the best interests of said club?

N.B - Thread title. No agenda, just a simple, unloaded question.

Poll to follow.

[NewarkR]

Agenda-less.

Yeah, right.

[Factamondo]

i see no reason why that buffoon remains at the club...........as usefull as piles!!!

[Stanley]

Agenda-less.

Yeah, right.

I'm a democrat. If the majority are fine with it, then so am I.

NO AGENDA.

[stan_bowles]

They Sacked Sousa for supposedly leaking confidential information so he should go as well.

[NewarkR]

24 hours after a positive victory, you start a pointless poll where EVERYONE lines up on the same 2 sides of the fence as always and say there's no agenda?

Replace the name Gianni Paladini with 'Melissa who works in the box office'. Would you still have created the poll? No, didn't think so.

[Factamondo]

24 hours after a positive victory, you start a pointless poll where EVERYONE lines up on the same 2 sides of the fence as always and say there's no agenda?

Replace the name Gianni Paladini with 'Melissa who works in the box office'. Would you still have created the poll? No, didn't think so.

is there a 'melissa'???? 'diane' was worth a gander few years back

[ScottJones]

There are leaks at all clubs. From Liverpool to wherever.

(For what it's worth, I try to never talk to Gianni about QPR.)

If things didnt leak out of clubs then there would be no journos. Quick example of info getting out..my Dad spoke to a player two days ago, I watched the Ivory Coast game with a player, an ex player and two football agents, yesterday i spoke to a member of security staff at QPR as well as a well placed steward, someone on here is a player, somone on here is related to another player etc etc.

There are plenty of "sauces" shall we say.

Another example is egham...i know for a fact he doesnt know Gianni and well, his posts are pretty frigging bang on.

Finally, if people had issues with members of staff they would no longer be employed...and thats a fact

[NewarkR]

is there a 'melissa'???? 'diane' was worth a gander few years back

I have no idea. The question was hypothetical.

[stan_bowles]

Finally, if people had issues with members of staff they would no longer be employed...and thats a fact

Employers can sack them,not the fans who have issues with them.

[Factamondo]

I have no idea. The question was hypothetical.

im hungover.....'hypothetical?????......in idiots terms please???

[stan_bowles]

im hungover.....'hypothetical?????......in idiots terms please???

It means it was an example of a possible situation or question.

[Receed R]

I'm a democrat. If the majority are fine with it, then so am I.

NO AGENDA.

its whats called follow the leader

[Stanley]

24 hours after a positive victory, you start a pointless poll where EVERYONE lines up on the same 2 sides of the fence as always and say there's no agenda?

Replace the name Gianni Paladini with 'Melissa who works in the box office'. Would you still have created the poll? No, didn't think so.

"Pointless" in your opnion clearly. Obviously not for many others. The timing of the poll has no relation to yesterday's result. Whether it had been a win, lose or draw, the issue still remains. I repeat, there is NO AGENDA, at least from where I'm coming from. Dont quite see where Melissa in the box office fits in.

[Factamondo]

It means it was an example of a possible situation or question.

..........in idiots terms please