Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Nothing is guaranteed - Warnock

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Goddard
    Silver Seat
    • Dec 2009
    • 4529

    #1

    Nothing is guaranteed - Warnock

    Crystal Palace manager Neil Warnock insists his proposed switch from Selhurst Park to Queens Park Rangers is far from definite.

    More...
    Final Version - Hope you like it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1z0UQ0eqRM


    Follow Me On Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/QPRGoddard
  • Spencer
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 1745

    #2
    I thought he was at our ground today???

    Comment

    • luke_qpr832
      Silver Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 1702

      #3
      This is the story that never ends.yes it goes on and on my friends

      this is the story that never ends.yes it goes on and on my friends

      this is the story that never ends.yes it goes on and on my friends

      "birch said he rated u btw luke, congrats"

      Comment

      • maccatwo
        Silver Seat
        • Feb 2010
        • 2404

        #4
        Can't believe that we be talking to Palace without Warnock already agreeing personal terms. If we have it could end up looking like bunch of clowns

        Comment

        • QPRMendoza
          Bronze Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 522

          #5
          Not the most positive thing I have read in a while

          Comment

          • luke_qpr832
            Silver Seat
            • Mar 2009
            • 1702

            #6
            it is only teamtalk tho.everything said on there i take with a handful of salt
            "birch said he rated u btw luke, congrats"

            Comment

            • maccatwo
              Silver Seat
              • Feb 2010
              • 2404

              #7
              Am I looking at this on postive note that Warnock done deal but we talking to Palace regarding some of there players and well do the whole deal as one deal and we still talking regarding compensation for them

              Comment

              • Goddard
                Silver Seat
                • Dec 2009
                • 4529

                #8
                The way I look at it... I only want Warnock to come if HE wants to come.

                Bottom Line: If NW decides that he'd really rather stay at Palace, then I don't want him.
                IMO that quote is a good thing really, because do we really want a manager who is basically told that he has to go to QPR by an admin/suit?


                If the final decision is his, and he chooses to come to QPR - great.

                I don't want anyone who is forced to take the job, because that is not a solid foundation for the stability and commitment we need.


                He's not the kind of man to take a job that he doesn't want to do. he'd rather retire.
                So no problem with his quote in that article.
                Final Version - Hope you like it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1z0UQ0eqRM


                Follow Me On Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/QPRGoddard

                Comment

                • qblockpete
                  C Club
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 22186

                  #9
                  Pretty sure that team talk thing is from the weekend

                  Even though its gone up today
                  ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
                  THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

                  Comment

                  • luke_qpr832
                    Silver Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 1702

                    #10
                    agree completely goddard if he dont want to come then look elsewhere.
                    only thing i will say is that we have been led to believe on here that he had already agreed to come and it was only the compensation that was holding it up?
                    "birch said he rated u btw luke, congrats"

                    Comment

                    • WeAreQPR12
                      C Club
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 23547

                      #11
                      Pete was egham wrong regarding Warnock being down LR?
                      I played sunday league football today.

                      Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.

                      I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.

                      We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!

                      Comment

                      • qblockpete
                        C Club
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 22186

                        #12
                        no egham was spot on
                        ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
                        THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

                        Comment

                        • RussRanger
                          Unlucky Bloke
                          • Apr 2009
                          • 4055

                          #13
                          Warnock is his own man. He won't just up sticks just because an Administrator says a compensation package is favourable to the club. It has to a deal favourable to him too. It could be his last position so it has to be right. He's no mug (open to debate).

                          I think when he meets with Paladini/Briatore/Mittal whoever, he's first statement will be: "I've heard a lot about the goings on here. Some good managers have come and gone. There's been rumours of boardroom interference, players being bought and sold without the manager's involvement. Is this still going on? I want 100% assurances that I am in charge of team affairs and selections, player purchases etc. If not, I'm not coming here." And rightly so.

                          Think some of our other managers were either hoodwinked, (Dowie) or happy to go along with the DOF role in place. (Gigi, Sousa, Mags). Think Warnock will play hard-ball with them. If he is appointed than at least we know it's under his terms which must be a good thing.

                          Comment

                          • Goddard
                            Silver Seat
                            • Dec 2009
                            • 4529

                            #14
                            Originally posted by RussRanger
                            Warnock is his own man. He won't just up sticks just because an Administrator says a compensation package is favourable to the club. It has to a deal favourable to him too. It could be his last position so it has to be right. He's no mug (open to debate).

                            I think when he meets with Paladini/Briatore/Mittal whoever, he's first statement will be: "I've heard a lot about the goings on here. Some good managers have come and gone. There's been rumours of boardroom interference, players being bought and sold without the manager's involvement. Is this still going on? I want 100% assurances that I am in charge of team affairs and selections, player purchases etc. If not, I'm not coming here." And rightly so.

                            Think some of our other managers were either hoodwinked, (Dowie) or happy to go along with the DOF role in place. (Gigi, Sousa, Mags). Think Warnock will play hard-ball with them. If he is appointed than at least we know it's under his terms which must be a good thing.
                            Exactly.
                            Final Version - Hope you like it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1z0UQ0eqRM


                            Follow Me On Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/QPRGoddard

                            Comment

                            • stainrodisalegend
                              Platinum Seat
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 13624

                              #15
                              Might be wishful thinking but if it is as far advanced as the ITK crowd suggest there clearly have been unofficial talks - probably all parties just have to steer carefully because that might constitute an illegal approach?

                              Comment

                              Working...