Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Deleted thread?! Why censor debate?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bingo
    replied
    Originally posted by scott_jones View Post
    neither of us are.

    sorry, how is this relevant to the rest of the thread?

    not getting enough attention are we Jones? (LFW aside)

    Leave a comment:


  • sirpiechucker
    replied
    Originally posted by brightonr View Post
    Incredibly, it's now considerably longer than the original one that was locked.

    Funniest thing is that nobody seems to know the exact figures making the whole thing somewhat pointless.
    Exactly.

    We're 18th. We've not progressed particularly far under the Briatore regime but we live to fight another day because of Briatore and the people he brought in. So whatever the real amounts are it's time to move on and look to the future.

    Leave a comment:


  • scott_jones
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by WeAreQPR12 View Post
    Sirpie why aren't you a mod anymore?
    neither of us are.

    Leave a comment:


  • terry ball
    replied
    Originally posted by brightonr View Post
    Incredibly, it's now considerably longer than the original one that was locked.

    Funniest thing is that nobody seems to know the exact figures making the whole thing somewhat pointless.
    Well thats why this thread has dragged on. Pete has said he has the official figures, If he posted them up, then this thread wouldn't of even been started

    One can only assume he is lying or "spinning"

    Leave a comment:


  • brightonr
    replied
    Originally posted by sirpiechucker View Post
    Can't believe this thread is still going on. I think people should accept that Pete is never going to answer the questions with the answers that you want to hear.
    Incredibly, it's now considerably longer than the original one that was locked.

    Funniest thing is that nobody seems to know the exact figures making the whole thing somewhat pointless.

    Leave a comment:


  • WeAreQPR12
    replied
    Sirpie why aren't you a mod anymore?

    Leave a comment:


  • sirpiechucker
    replied
    Can't believe this thread is still going on. I think people should accept that Pete is never going to answer the questions with the answers that you want to hear.

    Leave a comment:


  • haqpr1963
    replied
    Originally posted by qblockpete View Post
    pkloft?

    You seem high on knowledge and like avoiding questions.

    Why did we not bring in Beckford, Kitson, Cox or Best and could bring in Faulrin for a supposed 3.5 million?

    In the 2 and half years how much did we spend on transfer fees comparedto who we sold?

    Play nicely and just answer the questions, because most can see you are avoiding them
    Just like you then (apart from the first part of course!)

    Any chance you could actually share some of these figures from your research with us mere mortals? Sorry, but in my business factual evidence is everything and I refuse to believe anything that is not backed up by such.

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    be interesting to see how much of Flavio's money Paladini threw away on wages and agents fees for the 30 odd crap players he brought in...should never have been given the responsibility of picking players to bring in....he is just not up to it and is too tempted by other determining factors..

    Leave a comment:


  • theblackmafia.
    replied
    Originally posted by qblockpete View Post
    Considering I get so many things wrong and no-one is ashamed of saying so, doubt you are right.

    if you had been around before GP took charge, you would know I was famous for leaks on the old official messageboard.

    Unlike you Chelsea boy, I have been an 'R since 1974, so try again me ol' fruit :laughter:

    As for your leaks on the Official :laughter:

    Leave a comment:


  • qblockpete
    replied
    Considering I get so many things wrong and no-one is ashamed of saying so, doubt you are right.

    if you had been around before GP took charge, you would know I was famous for leaks on the old official messageboard.

    Leave a comment:


  • terry ball
    replied
    Originally posted by qblockpete View Post
    What would you say if I said Ikeme was Hart's 2nd choice and the thing that prevented us getting Ashdown at Portsmouth was at the time they could have sold both James and the guy to Stoke (cannot remember his name)??, which would have left them short.

    Look, I am not here saying that some of the buys/loans have been rubbish think we have been unlucky in regards Watson and Reid, but the very reason why we couldn't bring a name/names of quality is simply the budget was not there.

    its okay talking about a Stead or healy, but they are not exactly pulling up trees.


    Where as our loanees are pulling their plonkers whilst sat at home

    for the record healey scored last night in only his second game

    Leave a comment:


  • theblackmafia.
    replied
    Originally posted by qblockpete View Post
    What would you say if I said Ikeme was Hart's 2nd choice and the thing that prevented us getting Ashdown at Portsmouth was at the time they could have sold both James and the guy to Stoke (cannot remember his name)??, which would have left them short.

    Look, I am not here saying that some of the buys/loans have been rubbish think we have been unlucky in regards Watson and Reid, but the very reason why we couldn't bring a name/names of quality is simply the budget was not there.

    its okay talking about a Stead or healy, but they are not exactly pulling up trees.

    I would again say "When GP goes, the leaks go and so will your info, so f... off GP".

    .......... just waiting for typical 'he aint my only source, I know a man at Football league HQ you know'.

    Leave a comment:


  • qblockpete
    replied
    What would you say if I said Ikeme was Hart's 2nd choice and the thing that prevented us getting Ashdown at Portsmouth was at the time they could have sold both James and the guy to Stoke (cannot remember his name)??, which would have left them short.

    Look, I am not here saying that some of the buys/loans have been rubbish think we have been unlucky in regards Watson and Reid, but the very reason why we couldn't bring a name/names of quality is simply the budget was not there.

    its okay talking about a Stead or healy, but they are not exactly pulling up trees.

    Leave a comment:


  • terry ball
    replied
    Originally posted by brightonr View Post
    Hi Terry,

    As you know, I have no agenda one way or the other. However, if you are correct with this assumption, then does logic not dictate that GP should not soldier all of the blame, on the basis that the players that are prepared to come to us are vastly inferior to those that are not, hence he cannot be criticised for bringing in players of Bent's pedigree as opposed to the potential of Cox. The flip side of course, is that he is somehow responsible for the decline in the way things are done here, bringing that problem upon himslf to some degree. Just a balanced opinion as I have no great insight into the workings of our club.
    I agree that we are going to struggle to attract the "quality player" to the club when the better angler is fishing about. In my opinion, the players he bought to the club this Jan were no improvement on what we had. Helgusson is of the same standard as Bent, Quashie has failed to nail down a place in the starting 11 and we got Priskin whilst Jon Stead went on loan to Coventry.

    David Healy is another who went on loan to Ipswich, a proven international striker. I don't believe he was out of reach

    It was also reported that Paul Hart had agreed a deal with Peter Storie for Ashdown, (far superior than Ikeme imo) Tommy smith and Williamson only for GP to scupper the deal which allegedly was the final straw for Hart in his decision to resign

    So while i accept that GP may of had his hands tied in regards to budgets towards the end, he has failed to improve our squad for the all important final stage of the season.

    I don't see how there is any defence for a man who has had to bring in 11 loans this season (the most in the divison). It stinks of failure, filling gaps in an unbalanced squad with loanees who dont give a ****.

    Oh, and 47 players later, we still have no right back

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X