We are no longer buying players for the sake of it. I'd say give us another 2 to 3 seasons and we'll be ready to fight again.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Refreshing to see
Collapse
X
-
Also if Dykes signs , that would be 3 players signed already all no older than 24 years old and with potential to improve and sell on at a profit.What a shocking job Les and co. are doing .Originally posted by MYU View PostWe are no longer buying players for the sake of it. I'd say give us another 2 to 3 seasons and we'll be ready to fight again.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Amos has a 40% sell on clauseOriginally posted by Stainrod View Post
Also if Dykes signs , that would be 3 players signed already all no older than 24 years old and with potential to improve and sell on at a profit.What a shocking job Les and co. are doing .
Les is not doing a good job at allUnder Les Ferdinand:
Luke Freeman, top assists in the league: 4million
Alex Smithies, great goalie for this club: 3,5million
Charlie Austin, 19 Premier League goals: 4million
Jack Robinson: Contract ran out, left for free
And many more mistakes
LES FERDINAND, IT'S TIME TO GO
Comment
-
You've got to remember what went on the previous 4 years or so ! Is it Warbuton ? 3 years of parachute payment plssed on mainly dross players wages fees agent fees ect , very welcome tho hopefully we stick with a manager long enough for him to complete the jobOriginally posted by Stainrod View Post
Also if Dykes signs , that would be 3 players signed already all no older than 24 years old and with potential to improve and sell on at a profit.What a shocking job Les and co. are doing .
Comment
-
Which I assume we thought was a good deal when it comes with a nominal fee or a free transfer. I would be confident there would have been an option for a 15% sell on fee if we paid £2m for his signature. I reckon with our budget we took the right option and hopefully there are similar deals out there to be struck.Originally posted by qpr View Post
Amos has a 40% sell on clause
Les is not doing a good job at all
Comment
Comment