Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Should Tony Fernandes sell QPR in the future?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TheriusRS94
    Apprentice
    • May 2019
    • 7

    #1

    Should Tony Fernandes sell QPR in the future?

    It's already almost eight years since QPR owned by Tony Fernandes and still not improve. Time for QPR to consider new owner in the future to save QPR. New owner means QPR will planning smart investment and helping QPR going back to PREMIER LEAGUE is an objective. I believe Tony Fernandes should focusing AirAsia airline business only.

    In 2014 Tony Fernandes sold Anglo-Malaysian F1 squad Caterham F1 Team to Swiss-Middle East investors and later Caterham GP2 Team to Teddy Yip Jr. in late-2014.
    9
    Likely
    11.11%
    1
    Possibly
    33.33%
    3
    Unlikely and never going to happen
    55.56%
    5
  • superhoop67
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 3782

    #2
    would have trouble giving it away at moment
    Football played the Charlie Ferris way

    Comment

    • Gtleighsr3
      CCG
      • Mar 2009
      • 23569

      #3
      tbf if your rich,the best way to become poor is buy a football club,crazy folk
      Chelmsford City the home of Radio

      Comment

      • TheriusRS94
        Apprentice
        • May 2019
        • 7

        #4
        How about Jack Ma (Alibaba Group Owner and CEO)?

        Comment

        • Stainrod
          Silver Seat
          • Jan 2018
          • 3162

          #5
          Every seller needs a buyer and they won’t be tripping over each other to buy qpr .

          Comment

          • Undecided
            Silver Seat
            • Sep 2017
            • 2077

            #6
            He has to sell sooner or later. It just won't be any time soon.

            Comment

            • shaggy24
              Gold Seat
              • Apr 2016
              • 5826

              #7
              Wont sell in a million years if we move to Linford christie and he's got LR to pocket cash from. He's a Berk but not that daft

              The guy had good intentions but surrounded himself by prats with no idea.

              Comment

              • YoungR1
                Apprentice
                • Dec 2018
                • 91

                #8
                Originally posted by shaggy24
                Wont sell in a million years if we move to Linford christie and he's got LR to pocket cash from. He's a Berk but not that daft

                The guy had good intentions but surrounded himself by prats with no idea.
                Bang on. Selling LR is the only way he can recoup his losses. I just hope Linford Christie works out or we could end up in Berkshire or something..

                Comment

                • 1cliveallen
                  Bronze Seat
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 487

                  #9
                  Originally posted by YoungR1

                  Bang on. Selling LR is the only way he can recoup his losses. I just hope Linford Christie works out or we could end up in Berkshire or something..
                  I thought we sold Loftus Road years ago to stay, back when Crouchie and Lee Cook donated money to the club.

                  Comment

                  • Shepherds Mush
                    Platinum Seat
                    • Nov 2012
                    • 10325

                    #10
                    Ultimately the question on TF is - at what point does a gambler cut his losses ?

                    Personally think he has his eyes on the prize and won't sell up until he's made most of his dough back.

                    Comment

                    • SheepRanger
                      Administrator
                      • Apr 2018
                      • 8472

                      #11
                      He's hardly got anything to sell.

                      I think he once owned the majority of shares but Ruben has taken that over as a result of loans being given and paid for in shares. I doubt if TF actually owns more than 10% now due to share dilution.

                      Comment

                      Working...