Freeman

[West Acton]

Oh sorry west thought you were asleep

Will be be soon now you have started posting

[WeAreQPR12]

I've made a fortune curing insomnia

[Joe90]

Mixed feelings about him. On the one hand I think he's good and have seen on many occasions his frustration when manages to get forward and isn't supported by anyone - one of my biggest gripes, how slow we can be on the break and our lack of movement off the ball. On the other hand he's obviously at his level and makes lots of mistakes. At the moment we're better off with him.

[Rangers77]

Big Freeman fan, but unsure how to use him. Would be in the hole if we didn't play 442, but I wanna play 442 with Pav on the right wing and the two professional, qualified loan strikers UK up top. Freeman isn't a winger, so I'd play him next to Cameron in the middle with Bright out left. Eze is a luxury player for us now, so can only be an impact sub. Scowen and Luongo presently don't deserve their places. Freeman is, whatever else, a grafter, so can do a defensive role in the middle of a four. That Eze cannot do.

[1973 ranger]

77. Have to disagree with you on aying him in the middle as part of a two as he does not get around the pitch quick enough and does not track back enough. Wide left is the only place for him as not good enough to be our number 10 type player as does not score enough goals. Eze is a better bet in that role as he can go both ways so less predictable.

[Shania]

Got skills, but not effective enough,imo.

[Shepherds Mush]

If you could only play one (which I think you have to for our best set up) would it be Eze or Freeman ?

[Shania]

Eze.. If you ask me.

[1973 ranger]

Eze for me.

[Shepherds Mush]

As much as I like Freeman for how he gets about the pitch and his willingness to drive forward, I'd have to have Eze as our lone maverick as well.