Originally posted by davieqpr
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
loan market
Collapse
X
-
it depends really. martin and other experienced players no doubt do have part of their wages covered by the club bringing them in on loan but young players tend to have 100% of their wages covered by their parent club. its a win win for both clubs that way, the young player gets experience and regular game time
-
We have done very well and benefitted from the loan market hugely in the past. It’s not ideal but don’t get why your so anti itOriginally posted by SheepRanger View PostWhy should we spend money on loan fees and wages to develop another teams talent when there's no resale value from our spend? HR stated premiership loans are very expensive. I would rather we pick up the ones they've released, like we've already done, and do it for us. No loans for me, only permi signings that are cheap or free and stick them on 12 month deals will options to extend if they do well.
Comment
-
Because it's been stated to be so expensive. Loan fees of £1m for a kid from the premier league for a season and then wages. It's not a cheap option as I see it.Originally posted by West Acton View PostWe have done very well and benefitted from the loan market hugely in the past. It’s not ideal but don’t get why your so anti it
Comment
-
Suppose it depends on type and reputation of player your trying get on loan. Top end like a loftus cheek I can see that but we won’t be in for players on loan of that calibreOriginally posted by SheepRanger View Post
Because it's been stated to be so expensive. Loan fees of £1m for a kid from the premier league for a season and then wages. It's not a cheap option as I see it.
Comment
-
Agreed. Also don't agree with the arguement that we're only developing another team's talent - if that player is helping us progress what's the problem? Everyone's a winner? It's not unheard of that a player develops a relationship with the club he's loaned to and returns when it's clear he won't get in his own first team.Originally posted by West Acton View PostSuppose it depends on type and reputation of player your trying get on loan. Top end like a loftus cheek I can see that but we won’t be in for players on loan of that calibre
Comment
-
I also think there might be some sort of restrictions on us with regard how much we're allowed to pay in wages for loans,, also as someone has stated, there is normally a loan fee, and you have to pay a sizable amount of the loanee's wage, so cant see us getting too much quality on the cheap
Comment
-
Chris Martin whilst on loan at Reading had a loan fee plus 100% of his wages plus £10k a week on top. As stated before you only really need loan players if you are
aiming for promotion or trying to avoid relegation. There is no need if we are going for mid table.
Comment
-
Our aim will be to avoid relegation so I can see a loan player coming in.Originally posted by davieqpr View PostChris Martin whilst on loan at Reading had a loan fee plus 100% of his wages plus £10k a week on top. As stated before you only really need loan players if you are
aiming for promotion or trying to avoid relegation. There is no need if we are going for mid table.
Comment
-
-
Its a factual statement and hes regarded as a great coach. The reason for replacing Ollie was to 'push on'. I would have thought that witb the managerial change we have higher aspirations than merely avoiding relegation. Ollie proved he could meet that requirement.Originally posted by Norths View Post
What does him being an ex-england manager (massive flop 11 years ago, btw) have to do with our aim for this season?
Comment

Comment