Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
McLaren within 24hrs
Collapse
X
-
Talking silly. The current fine is based on obsolete, out of date FFP rules. The club can still lose money as long as the owners cover the losses.Do you think clubs like Villa or Brum would have passed on the old rules? We can if wanted lose about £13m a year nowdays.Comment
-
Challenging FFP by some brave soul should have been done ages ago.There are more holes in it than...errr....something with a lot of holes.Get some very aggressive law firm like Mishcon involved and settle down to watch the fireworks.Got to be cheaper to fork out for legal costs than a whopping fine.I'd be uber confident of a result,and your name will go down in sporting history like Bosman.Comment
-
Swiss cheese perhaps Blob?
Challenging FFP by some brave soul should have been done ages ago.There are more holes in it than...errr....something with a lot of holes.Get some very aggressive law firm like Mishcon involved and settle down to watch the fireworks.Got to be cheaper to fork out for legal costs than a whopping fine.I'd be uber confident of a result,and your name will go down in sporting history like Bosman.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
My source tells me that new QPR manager appointment is imminent,most likely before the start of pre-season.Banning people is no longer my hobby,
but take a look at my photo blog:
http://kirillqpr.blogspot.com/
How and why did I start supporting QPR in Estonia:
http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/forum/blog.php?b=852Comment
-
Comment
-
Definitely smacks of someone buying QPR, simply for the fact that Holloway has not spoken a word about his "sacking" (confidentiality agreement).
Same situation as that other well run club Sunderland (IMO).Comment
-
Interesting, Mush. But why sack a manager when you’re selling? Clearing the decks for the new owners?Comment
Comment