Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
De Canio Doing Well At Leece
Collapse
X
-
Okay, under LDC, we had Buzz flying, Vine flying, Pat flying. Most notifbly the first two. Under PS, we had neither of them, at the time prob out best two attacking players. Without them, we struggled, so PS bult on the solid back line. If PS had the team we have today, it would have been a lot, lot better and im sure we would be in the play offsWritller
but Sousa realised that he had been handed a badly assembled unbalanced squad that had it's limitations and was planning for the following season - the squad got found out pure and simple
I Would agree with that, if he had not started off well.
the squad cannot become unbalanced from 27th January, we only really brought in Routledge/. It became unbalanced because he was trying everything from playing one front to not to lose games as opposed to go out and win them, thats a big differenceComment
-
Pete if anyone is trying to fool supporters, it is you.
Haqqpr's figures show points gained, not just games won.
Magilton arguably had the best squad out of all those managers listed, yet his points per game ratio is only marginally better.
Originally Posted by haqpr1963
Lets just look at some facts, and not just based on win ratios.
LDC : 34 games 47 points 1.38 points/game
PS : 23 games 32 points 1.39 points/game
JM : 20 games 28 points 1.40 points/game
Points count more on a league table than wins.
Hyperthetically;
Magilton's team could win 17 draw 5 lose 24 F 58 A 65 = 56pts
Sousa's could win 15 draw 21 and lose 10 F42 A 25 = 66pts
Who's would you prefer?Comment
Comment