Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

why are we not associated

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • themodfather
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 4317

    #1

    why are we not associated

    with "name" managers?
    qpr is a job to be desired, we are a decent london outfit , so i wonder why we seem to attract lower level managers?

    we never seem to be among the named managers....i have heard ince,hart,southgate, rodgers??

    and never el tel, george graham, coppell!!

    the prem lge is the holy grail....we need a knight in shining armour not a squire with a donkey!
  • EYR
    Gold Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 5470

    #2
    Apart from the 'Saving the club aspect' since the takeover you cant help think weve just become a laughing stock,a club for the pundits and media to poke fun at.
    We just seem to go from one disaster to another,the last two managers have now left under a cloud,10 managers in 3yrs speaks for itself.

    I dont even think we need a knight in shining armour,just somebody on the board who knows how to run a football club properly will do.

    Comment

    • m_cooper
      Silver Seat
      • Jul 2009
      • 1341

      #3
      because we hire and fire just for the fun of it,until paladini keeps his nose out of player dealings we will not get a manager of note;and fat flav leaves the manager to manage

      Comment

      • Gtleighsr3
        CCG
        • Mar 2009
        • 23569

        #4
        We were linked with Zidan,wasnt we>LOL
        Chelmsford City the home of Radio

        Comment

        Working...