Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Hall......please no more

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • themodfather
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 4317

    #1

    Hall......please no more

    he came on we lose a vital , needed win....
    within a minute of being negative by bringing him on...they equalize and crush us.

    how many do we concede with him on the park...???

    a waste of transfer fee and wages, offers little,COSTS A LOT!
  • BennyBoyRs
    I like 'Lone' time
    • Mar 2009
    • 13695

    #2
    Oh dear luke...another scapegoat? Ramage last year, now Hall.

    Stewart was at fault for BOTH goals, but why let what really happened stand in the way of the next Zesh Rehman?

    As you all well know, I'm not at all a fan of Hall, but to blame him is childish. He actually made a critical clearence as soon as he came on. Stewart messed up SEVERAL times tonight and was lucky not to have been punished more often. Ball watching, trying to compose instead of clearing the ball, letting it bounce and gereral lapses in concentration were just a few faults from him tonight.

    We're trying to protect a needed win, so bringing on Hall for once made sense. He did NOT cost us. Faurlin trying to pass to the Pelican instead of keeping posession, followed by yet another indecisive moment from Damo cost us.
    Your mum would love me...

    Comment

    • bpr11
      Bronze Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 373

      #3
      I can not believe Faurlin did not take the ball into the corner....... Not a fan of Hall at all but you cant blame him for last night.

      There is no curse of Hall it was a silly decision by Faurlin that cost us (Im a Faurlin fan) but there is no spinning that mistake.
      “You can keep that silly fat w@nker. The lads can't lift him”

      Comment

      • paulmason
        Banned
        • Mar 2009
        • 7443

        #4
        Originally posted by themodfather
        he came on we lose a vital , needed win....
        within a minute of being negative by bringing him on...they equalize and crush us.

        how many do we concede with him on the park...???

        a waste of transfer fee and wages, offers little,COSTS A LOT!
        He was not at fault for the goal, but he did not have to be in the field, the same for the Pelican. Pat and Simpson should have stayed on the pitch as they were not injured.

        Comment

        • themodfather
          Silver Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 4317

          #5
          i blame the substitution
          negative....

          i dislike hall....he won't come good, he came on to boos!

          ball for 2nd came off stewarts shoulder, dropped to cox, hard luck..seemingly all half balls dropped to wba...

          he was not involved in the goal..qpr thought we'd run down clock with a sub, hall on and ref added time...
          we'd played the 3 mins added but 2-2 came during the 30 secs of added added time for sub!!

          why did we need hall?
          also 4 qpr players near ball when cox scored.

          ramage turned it around, still gets stick in places
          i never slagged off palyers like wilson,warren neill,ian dawes, ian gillard, bob hazell, glenn roeder, maddix cos they were good!
          BARDSLEY...REMEMBER THE **** HE TOOK AND BECAME A QPR LEGEND AND AN ENGLAND FULL BACK!

          Comment

          Working...