Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Is this a set up??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • qprmarc
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 1942

    #1

    Is this a set up??

    So the club dont have to fork out compensation for sacking jim, they could dismiss him for breach of his contract ( as they did sousa) and not spend a penny. Maybe something was blown out of proportion. Very clever by the club in my opinion, dont mind that at all.
  • Receed R

    #2
    i think sousa is still owed money by the club as he contested his sacking

    Comment

    • ollyhoops
      Gold Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 6013

      #3
      Well I've been saying that it was an excuse to get rid of magilton.

      Look at it this way, if we had beaten middlesborough and watford we wouldn't be having this conversation, it does coincide with bad results and poor performances.

      Comment

      • stanistheman
        Platinum Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 11151

        #4
        apart from a 5 or 6 game purlpe patch, QPR have been poor all season. Largely due to a tinkerman bully, Magilton. He did the same at Ipswich.

        Comment

        • shayqprman
          Apprentice
          • Aug 2009
          • 147

          #5
          i personally think this is just a way of getting rid of Magilton just like Sousa and Holloway....

          Whilst Flabbio was away from the club the performances and results were excellent even at derby and 2-0 down there was a great feeling that QPR would fight and win the game which they did.

          just like Holloway, Waddock, Gregory, Dowie and Sousa though Magilton has been forced out

          Comment

          Working...