Contrary to some earlier reports

[wortonranger]

Their second goal was clearly onside and our disallowed " goal " was for a foul on their defender who fell into their keeper. Both correct decisions. Oh well.

[West Acton]

Where has this thread come from

[WeAreQPR12]

I think some on here are losing the plot tbh west

[Ed the Ball]

its not over until its over lol

[wortonranger]

Maybe some of you don't read the excellent match reports on Loft For Words and others who were saying that if our goal had stood it would have been different etc etc. Don't see how that makes me a plot loser? Baffled. As a former ref I like it when they get it right, which they usually do.

[wortonranger]

Where has this thread come from

Essex if that helps.

[West Acton]

I said in other thread I could see why goal was disallowed but have not seen replay so Opinion based on one view from opposite end of ground. Was foul cut and shut???

I'm not done who sees everything through qpr specs I never thought Blackburn disallowed goal was 100% over the line

[corbray]

i thought it was fair that our goal was disallowed tbh, smith clearly backed into their defender who fell into the keeper. would have been harsh to give it

[Rebel R's]

So it's yet another "let's blame the ref" thread

[72bus]

smith's goal should have stood it was no foul it was a 'coming together' , would of it been given as a foul if it was on the half way line

[Stanley]

So it's yet another "let's blame the ref" thread

Where has anyone blamed the ref up until your post?

[CroydonCaptainJack]

So it's yet another "let's blame the ref" thread

It's the opposite isn't it?

[corbray]

yeah i thought the ref was pretty good tbh. if smith's goal had been against us and stood we'd have all been fuming, even our players didn't react when the ref disallowed it as they knew it was a foul