Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Matt Smith on board - Official

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Norths
    replied
    3 and a half year deal

    Leave a comment:


  • acricketer
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Rangers77
    replied
    Originally posted by hal9thou
    Except that you don't want your front line dictated by having to accomodate one dimensional players, no matter how keen they are. I think these two give us an option together, but we wont always be up against sides who suit what boils down to good old 4-4-2. And when they do play together, they need service, that was MS's problem at FFC - he didnt get any. I still think the best Olly sides have been pacey 4-3-3 outfiits, that would be a useful alternative strategy.
    Fair points, but good to have the option of 442 for some games and as a change in others.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lunar Jetman
    replied
    Its official now

    Leave a comment:


  • Kit
    replied
    Originally posted by Shepherds Mush
    Got a strange feeling this will be a sublime signing....
    In the Header Helguson mould so why not, you might just be right !

    Leave a comment:


  • Rebel R's
    replied
    Originally posted by Shepherds Mush
    Got a strange feeling this will be a sublime signing....
    That is a strange feeling

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger Ninja
    replied
    For a big lad his strengths have to be his aerial ability, physical strength and ability to hold the ball up. It'll be interesting.

    Leave a comment:


  • hal9thou
    replied
    Originally posted by Rangers77
    Gets my support. Upfront with Washington.
    Except that you don't want your front line dictated by having to accomodate one dimensional players, no matter how keen they are. I think these two give us an option together, but we wont always be up against sides who suit what boils down to good old 4-4-2. And when they do play together, they need service, that was MS's problem at FFC - he didnt get any. I still think the best Olly sides have been pacey 4-3-3 outfiits, that would be a useful alternative strategy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rangers77
    replied
    Originally posted by WCE
    Maybe Luongo was in China, when it happened.
    Probably sitting in front of the back four catching his breath.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rangers77
    replied
    Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod
    Not on my watch.

    Leave a comment:


  • WCE
    replied
    Maybe Luongo was in China, when it happened.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kevin Mcleod
    replied
    Not on my watch.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rangers77
    replied
    Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod
    Me too.
    Manning wins the ball, simple pass to Ravel, who feeds Freeman or Lua Lua with a defence splitting through ball to cross it for Smith to nod to down to Washington for the tap in



    Wot? No Luongo?

    Leave a comment:


  • Kevin Mcleod
    replied
    Originally posted by Shepherds Mush
    Got a strange feeling this will be a sublime signing....
    Me too.
    Manning wins the ball, simple pass to Ravel, who feeds Freeman or Lua Lua with a defence splitting through ball to cross it for Smith to nod to down to Washington for the tap in



    Leave a comment:


  • nanocopic
    replied
    Originally posted by Tarbie
    Seems like we have a carbon copy of Polter and 2.5m quid left in the bank. Can't be bad really!
    Good point Tarbs. Plus as Rangers77 said would like to see with Washington.

    Leave a comment:

Working...