Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

El Khayati Offski

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Northolt_Rs
    replied
    Originally posted by Ablockhoop
    Signings under Les haven't all been bad. Smithies has been superb in goal. Hall quality. Lynch looks very good. Although some on here won't agree perch has been a good signing for 500k. I still rate Massimo and think he has a lot of potential. Overall Les had a Monmouth task on his hands. He had to rid of a dozen or so top end earners while his remit was to replace them with players with potential and to make a profit. We are only 18 months into his work.

    Polter apparently doubling our outlay.
    Sandro is almost the final big earner gone
    Chery doubled out lay.
    Hall free transfer but easily worth 5m
    Smithies going well.

    Let's remember that when we had Harry in the prem and Les took over, over 60/70% of active posters on here were happy to strip the club back to basics and have ' a couple of years of mid table rebuilding'

    Short, tunnel visioned minds some people
    I think if we were guaranteed a mid table place most of us would be content. It's the yawning chasm of relegation into Division 1 that's got us all panting it. Being relegated would be an absolute disaster for the club.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shania
    replied
    Originally posted by Buffalo
    Don't really see why some are coating Les off for signing him. He was obviously JFH's choice as he had managed him at Burton. All Les is guilty of here is backing his manager surely?
    This.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hubble
    replied
    Originally posted by Ablockhoop
    Signings under Les haven't all been bad. Smithies has been superb in goal. Hall quality. Lynch looks very good. Although some on here won't agree perch has been a good signing for 500k. I still rate Massimo and think he has a lot of potential. Overall Les had a Monmouth task on his hands. He had to rid of a dozen or so top end earners while his remit was to replace them with players with potential and to make a profit. We are only 18 months into his work.

    Polter apparently doubling our outlay.
    Sandro is almost the final big earner gone
    Chery doubled out lay.
    Hall free transfer but easily worth 5m
    Smithies going well.

    Let's remember that when we had Harry in the prem and Les took over, over 60/70% of active posters on here were happy to strip the club back to basics and have ' a couple of years of mid table rebuilding'

    Short, tunnel visioned minds some people
    I love this board when malapropisms abound! (Was it predictive text?)

    Good post though, and Buffalo makes a good point about Les backing his manager.

    Leave a comment:


  • amusant
    replied
    Nasser always seemed an odd signing

    Leave a comment:


  • Lunar Jetman
    replied
    Originally posted by 1974Rs
    So IH has reversed the voodoo??
    Well either that or Les is backing the manager like he backed the previous one....

    Leave a comment:


  • 1974Rs
    replied
    Originally posted by Lunar Jetman
    Yeah but didn't you realise that Evil Les brainwashed JFH into getting him so it must be his fault all along....
    So IH has reversed the voodoo??

    Leave a comment:


  • 1QPRDK
    replied
    Originally posted by Lunar Jetman
    Yeah but didn't you realise that Evil Les brainwashed JFH into getting him so it must be his fault all along....
    Word

    Leave a comment:


  • Lunar Jetman
    replied
    Originally posted by Buffalo
    Don't really see why some are coating Les off for signing him. He was obviously JFH's choice as he had managed him at Burton. All Les is guilty of here is backing his manager surely?
    Yeah but didn't you realise that Evil Les brainwashed JFH into getting him so it must be his fault all along....

    Leave a comment:


  • Shepherds Mush
    replied
    Originally posted by West London is Rss
    Perhaps - I call it being successful though.
    Should of done more research etc. minimize as many risks as possible. Whether Les does this or not, who knows - in Polters case, it seems not.
    Maybe. I'd say buying any player is a gamble though - could be brilliant in one team and absolute sh*te in another. To get rid of the sh*te at a profit though is not easy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Buffalo
    replied
    Don't really see why some are coating Les off for signing him. He was obviously JFH's choice as he had managed him at Burton. All Les is guilty of here is backing his manager surely?

    Leave a comment:


  • West London is Rss
    replied
    Originally posted by Shepherds Mush
    Your boss may need to go on a motivational methods course...
    Perhaps - I call it being successful though.
    Should of done more research etc. minimize as many risks as possible. Whether Les does this or not, who knows - in Polters case, it seems not.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shepherds Mush
    replied
    Originally posted by West London is Rss
    Suppose so, but if it was me at work, my boss would say I shouldn't of bought such a useless piece of sh1ite in the 1st place, that didn't do it's job and gave me the hassle of having to go through the process of selling it on after a year for a minimal profit.
    Your boss may need to go on a motivational methods course...

    Leave a comment:


  • Cjskinz
    replied
    Originally posted by Ablockhoop
    Signings under Les haven't all been bad. Smithies has been superb in goal. Hall quality. Lynch looks very good. Although some on here won't agree perch has been a good signing for 500k. I still rate Massimo and think he has a lot of potential. Overall Les had a Monmouth task on his hands. He had to rid of a dozen or so top end earners while his remit was to replace them with players with potential and to make a profit. We are only 18 months into his work.

    Polter apparently doubling our outlay.
    Sandro is almost the final big earner gone
    Chery doubled out lay.
    Hall free transfer but easily worth 5m
    Smithies going well.

    Let's remember that when we had Harry in the prem and Les took over, over 60/70% of active posters on here were happy to strip the club back to basics and have ' a couple of years of mid table rebuilding'

    Short, tunnel visioned minds some people
    I said something very similar on the "Ferdinand" thread earlier, so obviously agree 100% with you!

    Leave a comment:


  • West London is Rss
    replied
    Originally posted by Ginger Ninja
    Can we at least give him credit for getting rid at a profit, a la Polter?
    Suppose so, but if it was me at work, my boss would say I shouldn't of bought such a useless piece of sh1ite in the 1st place, that didn't do it's job and gave me the hassle of having to go through the process of selling it on after a year for a minimal profit.

    He has made some good signings though within the guidelines - not going to go them all right with this new budget cut policy.

    All depends on how you look at it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shepherds Mush
    replied
    Originally posted by Ablockhoop
    Signings under Les haven't all been bad. Smithies has been superb in goal. Hall quality. Lynch looks very good. Although some on here won't agree perch has been a good signing for 500k. I still rate Massimo and think he has a lot of potential. Overall Les had a Monmouth task on his hands. He had to rid of a dozen or so top end earners while his remit was to replace them with players with potential and to make a profit. We are only 18 months into his work.

    Polter apparently doubling our outlay.
    Sandro is almost the final big earner gone
    Chery doubled out lay.
    Hall free transfer but easily worth 5m
    Smithies going well.

    Let's remember that when we had Harry in the prem and Les took over, over 60/70% of active posters on here were happy to strip the club back to basics and have ' a couple of years of mid table rebuilding'

    Short, tunnel visioned minds some people
    Quality post

    Leave a comment:

Working...