Always liked polter and feel that he does have the potential to be a real good player and a cult hero for us. Hes easy to like, has moments of skill and tries hard which is the type of player ollie likes. I reckon ollie will get the best out of him for us imo
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Polter
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Tarbie View PostTo be honest, I think our squad is far better suited to a 4-4-2 anyway. Sometimes I feel like the only reason we've been playing 1 up top is to accommodate Chery in that number 10 position.
JFH was sacrificing the team shape in order to accommodate Chery, who really was not justifying the decision in the way that Taarabt did for Warnock's team.
I still think that Sylla can so play alongside Polter, however, if it a choice between them, I'd select the former alongside Washington.
Comment
-
Originally posted by maidstone_hoop View PostFerdinand don't take training and JFH likes to play his forwards on the wingLast edited by dogsrrs; 17-11-2016, 03:30 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dogsrrs View PostMore or less what I was going to say Maids ! LF let JFH play his game and he was stubborn about one up and that was a game to far for our m/fielders , some of Polters best moves has been when he's gone wide and moved back in , it's been years now that we haven't seen opposing C/hs look good even not very good ones if we play two up any two from Idris Polter or Washington if you have m/ fielder pref Sandro who is more than capable of making charges up field with the ball that would allow your two forwards to both to move right and left ,or just one move wide taking the C/hs out of their comfort zones , to do this I would drop both Luongo and Chery having a m/f of Henry deep covering the backs cousins and Sandro maybe the French wideman and any two from the three up front
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stanley View PostI don't think we'll be seeing Polter going wide dogs. He said in the latest Loftcast Ollie only wants him to be a target man and doesn't want him venturing outside the box.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dogsrrs View PostNo I mean with 2 up one or both can move can move wider to split the centre backs I don't mean to go to flank as a winger tho with two They can go wide to the flanks pulling their defenders wide with 2 up your target men can have more movement where as with just one up its more ridged and the one target or forward it leaves him battling two centre backs on most occasions , and none of our forwards are really good enough to play the lone target man
Comment
Comment