Originally posted by West Acton
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Will that Formation work
Collapse
X
-
We now have a right back? Are you serious? Didn't do to bad getting forward but defensively, all over the place.Originally posted by Rangers77 View PostNo doubt, West. I enjoyed much of it. But still lost a game we should and could have won. Diabolical subs. And inconsistent tactics. The success of the middle two is an indictment of Jimmy. We now have a RB. But watch Nervous take his place Saturday. Still haven't scored in open play..... Washington was my motm.
Comment
-
Thought Kakay had a good game. More shaky defensively than offensive, sure, but looked tidy and gave us more options going forward than Ned does. I'd play him Saturday. Considering the useless Pole (I don't know his name) was in front of him he had little coverage.Originally posted by knocker View PostWe now have a right back? Are you serious? Didn't do to bad getting forward but defensively, all over the place.
Comment
-
Kakay was fantastic, he's got pace, energy, a great tackle on him and wins a lot in the air. You could possibly drop him into the first team from now till the end of the season and he might hold his own, but I'd rather give him semi-regular appearances at rb.Originally posted by corbray View PostWhat formation did we play? I was knackered and didnt go but judging by peoples enthusiasm we played good. Does kakay have the potential to be a first teamer?"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

Comment
-
We played a fluid 4231 today. The main difference between today and other recent matches was the fluidity up top. It meant that we switched easily between 4231 and 442. Defensively I was amazed by the positional fluidity. Kakay or Caulker would run forward and even Nasser - as poor as he was - would come back to cover.Originally posted by West London is Rss View PostProblem is, JFH has brought players in to fit his 4-2-3-1 formation"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane

Comment
-
More to it than just hard work last night. Happy to give the Polish lad the benefit of the doubt, but I thought him ineffective last night. Was blowing very hard mid way through the first half, so there's a issue with his fitness.Originally posted by CroydonCaptainJack View PostHe always works hard to be fair but you seem to be making a massive thing of it whilst slating a decent performance by the Polish lad.
Comment
-
Formation we started with last night should be how we go forward in the Championship as we actually have the players to suit it.
Problem is when Chery starts on Saturday, JFH will go back to 4-5-1 to accommodate him in his "preferred role".
Personally I'd put Chery in for El Khayati and play 4 across the middle.
Comment
-
I would also do this, it looked like NEK was playing in the Chery role, behind the front twoOriginally posted by Shepherds Mush View PostFormation we started with last night should be how we go forward in the Championship as we actually have the players to suit it.
Problem is when Chery starts on Saturday, JFH will go back to 4-5-1 to accommodate him in his "preferred role".
Personally I'd put Chery in for El Khayati and play 4 across the middle.
Comment
-
Fair enough, we can agree on CW at least. He played well.Originally posted by Rangers77 View PostMore to it than just hard work last night. Happy to give the Polish lad the benefit of the doubt, but I thought him ineffective last night. Was blowing very hard mid way through the first half, so there's a issue with his fitness.
Comment
Comment