Where has jfh gone wrong?

[nasser95]

Seems to me that whatever JFH tells them to do, we always end up literally playing 4-6-0

haha I get what you mean, but what I see is that players play 5-1-4 when Luongo is in and 6-0-4 when he's out. And it's useless we end up with literally no way to play it forward without booting it up.

[Shania]

I really can't tell whether I like what he says, I don't understand him half the time. There is no way he is 'fluent' in English.

Don`t forget that your English of obvious reasons is simply perfect, jmelaine.

[Shepherds Mush]

Static doesn't half describe it at times. Even in the Newcastle game where the players in attack should at least be trying to put in some effort, there was a huge huge gap right in the middle of the opposition half that no one exposed. CW in particular that game really really should have been reactive to the situation and just come deeper to give an outlet. Chery ends up moving so deep that you need CW just to get in that gap and take the ball off him and spread it or run at their defence. I mean, our one really good chance against Newcastle came when Caulker (I think) just ran straight at them and they wouldn't tackle him. He gets to the edge of the box but the attack is so static that he's probably the furthest player forward.

Seems to me that whatever JFH tells them to do, we always end up literally playing 4-6-0

[nasser95]

Do agree in most repects with this but also see that the possession game can draw out the opposition.

Biggest issue for is our strikers/forward players don't exploit space enough and our midfielders can't spot a pass when those rare opportunities arise. Can only describe our attack as "static".

Static doesn't half describe it at times. Even in the Newcastle game where the players in attack should at least be trying to put in some effort, there was a huge huge gap right in the middle of the opposition half that no one exposed. CW in particular that game really really should have been reactive to the situation and just come deeper to give an outlet. Chery ends up moving so deep that you need CW just to get in that gap and take the ball off him and spread it or run at their defence. I mean, our one really good chance against Newcastle came when Caulker (I think) just ran straight at them and they wouldn't tackle him. He gets to the edge of the box but the attack is so static that he's probably the furthest player forward.

[geejaybee]

JFH defends QPR formation.

At the end of the day Jimmy boy,your tactics just aren't working.Time to change.

http://www.itv.com/news/2016-09-20/qpr-manager-jimmy-floyd-hasselbaink-defends-tactics-and-urges-his-players-to-do-more/

[Shepherds Mush]

wherever we win the ball on the pitch it goes backwards and sideways and not forward ( most of the time) , thus allowing the opposition to get back into their shape .we play far to many safe balls . said this before we play like we are 2 nil up , when we are not 2 nil up . even if you don't have the most skilful players on the pitch if you are fit and get in the oppositions faces you will get more rewards than standing off jonjo shelvey and just admiring his range of passes

Do agree in most repects with this but also see that the possession game can draw out the opposition.

Biggest issue for is our strikers/forward players don't exploit space enough and our midfielders can't spot a pass when those rare opportunities arise. Can only describe our attack as "static".

[The Godfather]

Wow you really are a piece of work aren't you. I haven't pretended anything, you just evaded answering! I asked you who he hasn't played, go back and have a look. Now you've decided to answer, and your answer is weak unfortunately. JFH has used Washington as a second striker since he's played a one up front formation and Polter, being in-form, has therefore started, but CW has still been played and he started the last two games. And he's used El Khayati extensively. Borysiuk was injured and only just recovered and Sylla only just arrived FFS. I find your arguments specious.

Anyway, that's it for me tonight, I have better things to do than bandy semantics with you. Like go to sleep.

Oh, and as for the "language problem" - there is no problem - other than in your imagination. Have a listen to the podcast. Good night.

Yes, I'm a piece of work for disagreeing with you about a football team. Good idea, get to sleep before you're consumed by rage.

[Hubble]

I dealt with your first question about 'which players has he spent 8-10 million on?' - then you pretended you'd never asked out of embarrassment, so I couldn't be bothered...

Anyone who goes to the games would know he's barely used Washington and Khayati other than as impact substitutes. Borysiuk, the Polish winger and Sylla were all on the bench on Saturday, despite a 6-0 defeat midweek. What would have been lost by throwing them into the mix and taking a risk?

He continually shows a reluctance to field new signings, which suggests a lack of confidence in his own decision-making to me.

And regarding the language problem - I think it is an issue, as football management relies on communicating your ideas to people who are notoriously stupid. It's not the only issue, and not the most important, but if I were in the dressing room hearing him give a team-talk, I'd struggle to understand his precise instructions.

Wow you really are a piece of work aren't you. I haven't pretended anything, you just evaded answering! I asked you who he hasn't played, go back and have a look. Now you've decided to answer, and your answer is weak unfortunately. JFH has used Washington as a second striker since he's played a one up front formation and Polter, being in-form, has therefore started, but CW has still been played and he started the last two games. And he's used El Khayati extensively. Borysiuk was injured and only just recovered and Sylla only just arrived FFS. I find your arguments specious.

Anyway, that's it for me tonight, I have better things to do than bandy semantics with you. Like go to sleep.

Oh, and as for the "language problem" - there is no problem - other than in your imagination. Have a listen to the podcast. Good night.

[72bus]

wherever we win the ball on the pitch it goes backwards and sideways and not forward ( most of the time) , thus allowing the opposition to get back into their shape .we play far to many safe balls . said this before we play like we are 2 nil up , when we are not 2 nil up . even if you don't have the most skilful players on the pitch if you are fit and get in the oppositions faces you will get more rewards than standing off jonjo shelvey and just admiring his range of passes

[The Godfather]

You've still avoided answering the question about your awesome "10 contributory factors" post. Who are these players he's spent 8-10 million on and is not using? Huh?

I dealt with your first question about 'which players has he spent 8-10 million on?' - then you pretended you'd never asked out of embarrassment, so I couldn't be bothered...

Anyone who goes to the games would know he's barely used Washington and Khayati other than as impact substitutes. Borysiuk, the Polish winger and Sylla were all on the bench on Saturday, despite a 6-0 defeat midweek. What would have been lost by throwing them into the mix and taking a risk?

He continually shows a reluctance to field new signings, which suggests a lack of confidence in his own decision-making to me.

And regarding the language problem - I think it is an issue, as football management relies on communicating your ideas to people who are notoriously stupid. It's not the only issue, and not the most important, but if I were in the dressing room hearing him give a team-talk, I'd struggle to understand his precise instructions.

[Hubble]

Yes, that's what it's all about, despite citing about 10 contributory factors in my initial post.

Specious. You know what that is in reference to. You've still avoided answering the question in regard to your awesome "10 contributory factors" post. Who are these players he's spent 8-10 million on and is not using? Huh?

[brightonr]

I know we have lost two games on the trot and the manager is taking the flak from everywhere but coating off the elequential standard of his second language is a bit much imo.

I can understand what he says perfectly too.

What I don't understand is why he says it.

[The Godfather]

That's what all tihs is about IMO Kev.

Yes, that's what it's all about, despite citing about 10 contributory factors in my initial post.

[Hubble]

I know we have lost two games on the trot and the manager is taking the flak from everywhere but coating off the elequential standard of his second language is a bit much imo.

That's what all this is about IMO Kev.

[Hubble]

Isn't every opinion on a football club 'biased', or is there some sort of supreme, independent authority ruling on the quality of a football manager? I don't wish to be rude, but it has to be said that you really are a bit dim, aren't you?

Honestly, your rhetoric is pretty poor pal. Frilly, but lacking any substance.