Hill or Hall?

[OneJamieMackie]

Don't change a winning formula

[qpr4life]

Hill...

Not long left at QPR as a player, not playing for much now and to be fair to Clint he's in good form since Hally got injured.

Hall back in when required.

[West London is Rss]

Hill...

Not long left at QPR as a player, not playing for much now and to be fair to Clint he's in good form since Hally got injured.

Hall back in when required.

Not sure Hill not having long left to play in his career should be a valid reason for him to start... May as well of started him from the start of the season if that was going to be the case.

Love Hill but let's not get silly - the logical thing would be to put Hall back in when fully fit - Hill's a great campaigner and has always performed admirably but we need to keep nurturing Hall all we can and keep improving the chemistry we have had with him in the back four.
Hill knows he is nowadays only used when need be and rightly so when he is 37 and Hall (the future of QPR) is only 24.

[MattyRangers]

Hall. In fantastic form before his injury.

Love Clint. A real hero, and team player, but should be used sparingly. Never lets us down, but we don't want to flog him to death.

Exactly this.

[Brisbane]

Hill for me simply because you don't drop last week's MOTM no matter what.

[vanhoop]

Clint all day long, still strong and untold experience. He's the reason our fortunes have changed in the last few games, a proper leader!

[West Acton]

I know we all love Clint but you got think of him too. He's looked good in my opinion when he's been played because he's fresh and been used sparingly so far. If we are suggesting he should be start rest of season and next we won't see the same player who has been dripped in when required this season

[Hertford Hoop]

Hall is the next cult hero at QPR after Clint imo

[West London is Rss]

Clear to see on here sometimes that the ole' blue and white glasses dent the pure footballing reason.

A 37 year old Clint Hill over a 24 year old Grant Hall who's arguably been player of the season and our only decent performer for the first half of the season!

Let's get real here and look at it from the footballing point of view and not the heart point of view.

[Bigdave]

If it was a must win game, like a relegation or promotion 6 pointer then I'd definitely pick Hill and one other, more than likely Hall.

But as we are trying to build a side then it's logic to bring back Hall but has to be said that as per usual Clint Hill has stepped up to the plate when needed and proved there is life in the old dog yet.

[superhoop67]

Clear to see on here sometimes that the ole' blue and white glasses dent the pure footballing reason.

A 37 year old Clint Hill over a 24 year old Grant Hall who's arguably been player of the season and our only decent performer for the first half of the season!

Let's get real here and look at it from the footballing point of view and not the heart point of view.

Football is a results game ,you pick the team that will win

[Jimmy Floyd Rabbit]

Football is a results game ,you pick the team that will win

Yea and playing a slow 37 year old every week will make sure that won't happen often.

Less is more.

[West Acton]

Yea and playing a slow 37 year old every week will make sure that won't happen often.

Less is more.

Took words out my mouth

[superhoop67]

Yea and playing a slow 37 year old every week will make sure that won't happen often.

Less is more.

well you don't pick him evry week ,as i said ,you pick a team to win

[MattyRangers]

Seriously nobody can actually be saying Hill over Hall, can they??!!