Another 3 points closer to the relegation zone....

[klonk]

If X is elastic, then him making or not making this one post would not affect his reaching the end of his posting activity.

brisbane's point is sound as it relates to the number of posts and not to the span of posting activity. brisbane doesn't specify that bushkangaroo has a limited number of posts, nor does he claim that, through posting, the date of bushkangaroo's final post is in any way affected.

x is a finite positive number, although its value is currently unclear.

if a user has made y posts, then he currently has (x-y) posts remaining. if he makes another post, he has made (y+1) posts and will have (x-(y+1)) (or x-y-1) posts remaining. so one less post to go.

[Hertford Hoop]

brisbane's point is sound as it relates to the number of posts and not to the span of posting activity. brisbane doesn't specify that bushkangaroo has a limited number of posts, nor does he claim that, through posting, the date of bushkangaroo's final post is in any way affected.

x is a finite positive number, although its value is currently unclear.

if a user has made y posts, then he currently has (x-y) posts remaining. if he makes another post, he has made (y+1) posts and will have (x-(y+1)) (or x-y-1) posts remaining. so one less post to go.

Absolutely

[Kirill]

Bowlarks, you're all just ganging up on me

[Hertford Hoop]

Bowlarks, you're all just ganging up on me

[Kirill]

[bushkangaroo]

In fairness, I'm quite enjoying getting people's backs up a with a little bit of trolling. Some of this is because I reckon about 70% or so (and I reckon the percentage is growing) of posts on this site (WATRB forum site) are crap. Now, most of us probably think that there's a lot of crap posts, we just disagree on which ones are, and who are the worst culprits. I happen to think the quality of debate is much higher on dot.org, but hardly anyone bothers with it. They need more contributors. But there is a serious point behind all this, and I think Kirill has picked up on it. I was initially a big TF fan, but I've lost faith. I'm now very skeptical. I think West Ham likely dodged a bullet. Remember, we are all R's fans, we want the best for our club, and yes, most if not all of us have posted irritable, ill-thought out comments at times particularly since our hopes were raised so high a few years back. A lot of pots on here calling the kettle black, though!

[MattyRangers]

Another 3 points towards safety chaps. I think at this rate we might just get out of it.

[klonk]

Another 3 points towards safety chaps. I think at this rate we might just get out of it.

not so sure... we may need 79 points to stay up this year. one more slip up and we'll be proper back in the mire.

[bushkangaroo]

What a great sense of humour you have, klonky

[bushkangaroo]

Made me smile, I admit! Unlike Klonky's effort.

[bushkangaroo]

Another 3 points towards safety chaps. I think at this rate we might just get out of it.

Made me smile I admit, unlike Klonky's weak effort.

[Fraggy]

How did I miss this doozy of a thread.
Bush, your not from Tunbridge are you?