Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Pitch size

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sneezey15
    Bronze Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 598

    #1

    Pitch size

    Normally I think the pitch looks to small but today they Fulham used and exposed us it was way to big for most of them,the space they had was scary, and defence looked scared stiff of Dembele didn't lay a glove on him.
  • Rangers77
    Platinum Seat
    • Aug 2012
    • 11808

    #2
    We'd have lost if it were the size of a postage stamp. Parker and O'Hara, old pros that they are, had a field day.

    Comment

    • sneezey15
      Bronze Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 598

      #3
      Originally posted by Rangers77
      We'd have lost if it were the size of a postage stamp. Parker and O'Hara, old pros that they are, had a field day.
      The same Parker deemed by most on here as over the hill 2 years ago, agree they bossed it.

      Comment

      • Rangers77
        Platinum Seat
        • Aug 2012
        • 11808

        #4
        Originally posted by sneezey15
        The same Parker deemed by most on here as over the hill 2 years ago, agree they bossed it.
        I'd have taken him, but he refused twice to come.

        Comment

        • QPR1234
          Gold Seat
          • Mar 2009
          • 5250

          #5
          Exactly the way to play a 352. Burn won every long ball, the wingbacks was full of energy, three central midfielders who can get about the pitch and spray a pass and to top that, two very good strikers for this level.

          We have suffered for a real lack of zip in the middle for a fair few years. we have faurlin who has quality on the ball but thats about it. Luongo isnt a CM, especially as a part of a two man middle.
          Soldier: "im on reconnaissance sir.. im looking for our camouflage expert.. have you seen him?"
          Lovejoy: "No?!"
          Soldier: "GOD DAMNIT THAT GUYS GOOD!"

          Please Follow My Twitter

          Comment

          • MattyRangers
            Slimmer of The Year
            • Jun 2011
            • 24914

            #6
            Parker is past it . Decent game today but ffs let's not get carried away on one game. Fulham were 4th bottom before today and he's been $hit. Fark havin him here. Bloke is supposedly on 70 bags a week. Fark that.
            You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

            Comment

            • Rangers77
              Platinum Seat
              • Aug 2012
              • 11808

              #7
              Originally posted by MattyRangers
              Parker is past it . Decent game today but ffs let's not get carried away on one game. Fulham were 4th bottom before today and he's been $hit. Fark havin him here. Bloke is supposedly on 70 bags a week. Fark that.
              Only played seven times this season, so he's going nowhere. Ohara was on trial here, however. And Harry passed.

              Comment

              • 72bus
                Gold Seat
                • Mar 2011
                • 9492

                #8
                time and time again we failed to pick up McCormack, he's a clever player but today we gave him loads of space to play . our midfield is poor no pace or steel . o'hara and parker ran us ragged , bet they couldn't believe how easy it was

                Comment

                • CroydonCaptainJack
                  Gold Seat
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 6141

                  #9
                  I don't understand their league position. Far better than Ipswich on that showing. The most convincing loss all season.

                  Comment

                  • Brisbane
                    Apprentice
                    • Jul 2015
                    • 158

                    #10
                    Originally posted by GaxZE
                    Exactly the way to play a 352. Burn won every long ball, the wingbacks was full of energy, three central midfielders who can get about the pitch and spray a pass and to top that, two very good strikers for this level.

                    We have suffered for a real lack of zip in the middle for a fair few years. we have faurlin who has quality on the ball but thats about it. Luongo isnt a CM, especially as a part of a two man middle.
                    Luongo's said in interviews CM's his best position.
                    You support QPR?!?!

                    – Every Australian Ever

                    Comment

                    • 72bus
                      Gold Seat
                      • Mar 2011
                      • 9492

                      #11
                      loungo had an awlful game

                      Comment

                      • nanocopic
                        Silver Seat
                        • Oct 2015
                        • 1725

                        #12
                        Luongo had an awful.game this week but has played well recently, shouldn't be judged on one game nor should Parker who clearly hasn't been very influential in a.team so.close to the drop zone.

                        Comment

                        Working...