Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

How many players have we made a profit on?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MYU
    Administrator
    • Mar 2009
    • 43466

    #1

    How many players have we made a profit on?

    In that past few years?
  • jmelanie
    Gold Seat
    • Aug 2011
    • 7525

    #2
    Although we only got 4 million for Charlie, I would say we made a profit because we had two and a half years of him playing for us.

    Comment

    • MYU
      Administrator
      • Mar 2009
      • 43466

      #3
      Originally posted by jmelanie
      Although we only got 4 million for Charlie, I would say we made a profit because we had two and a half years of him playing for us.
      And the wages and bonuses we paid out, we should've at least broke even here.

      Comment

      • jmelanie
        Gold Seat
        • Aug 2011
        • 7525

        #4
        We might have made a profit on Remy, though I believe his wages were high.

        Comment

        • Abseits
          Gold Seat
          • Aug 2014
          • 5026

          #5
          £4 mil for Charlie is great business given we'd get nowt for him in a few months. If he'd have stayed I suspect we'd have not seen much of him anyway due to a succession of niggly strains and random tightness.
          The only way to make a profit is to buy young 'uns or unknown foreigners or develop youth players. Frankly, making a profit on players should not be our focus - we need to buy players based upon what they can bring to the team on the pitch now; not based on their resale value further down the line.

          Comment

          • 72bus
            Gold Seat
            • Mar 2011
            • 9508

            #6
            didn't we make a profit on mackie when we sold him

            Comment

            • CroydonCaptainJack
              Gold Seat
              • Jan 2011
              • 6141

              #7
              Originally posted by Abseits
              £4 mil for Charlie is great business given we'd get nowt for him in a few months. If he'd have stayed I suspect we'd have not seen much of him anyway due to a succession of niggly strains and random tightness.
              The only way to make a profit is to buy young 'uns or unknown foreigners or develop youth players. Frankly, making a profit on players should not be our focus - we need to buy players based upon what they can bring to the team on the pitch now; not based on their resale value further down the line.

              Comment

              • FACTS
                Apprentice
                • Nov 2015
                • 215

                #8
                Not many. Could've with Adel at one stage. How many players have improv3d during their time at QPR is a question you can't ignore. Why would other clubs pay more for them if they don't progress?

                Comment

                • MYU
                  Administrator
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 43466

                  #9
                  Originally posted by FACTS
                  Not many. Could've with Adel at one stage. How many players have improv3d during their time at QPR is a question you can't ignore. Why would other clubs pay more for them if they don't progress?
                  That's the question I should've asked, cheers Facts.

                  Comment

                  • winalotto
                    Gold Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 5524

                    #10
                    We used to make good money on players get em in from the lower leagues and sell them on was the qpr way. Les Ferdinand , Darren Peacock. Trevor Sinclair , Andy Sinton to name a few, we did ok on young Stirling made a few bob on him i recall earlier this year, im glad we seem to be reverting to the old and right way of doing things, bring in lower league or unknown players and try to turn them into top draw players before selling them on, instead of this buying a complete new team every transfer window and buying well known players on big contracts only to be disappointed.

                    Comment

                    • MYU
                      Administrator
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 43466

                      #11
                      Originally posted by winalotto
                      We used to make good money on players get em in from the lower leagues and sell them on was the qpr way. Les Ferdinand , Darren Peacock. Trevor Sinclair , Andy Sinton to name a few, we did ok on young Stirling made a few bob on him i recall earlier this year, im glad we seem to be reverting to the old and right way of doing things, bring in lower league or unknown players and try to turn them into top draw players before selling them on, instead of this buying a complete new team every transfer window and buying well known players on big contracts only to be disappointed.
                      That was one of the greatest things about our club, it was also so sad to see the players leave.

                      I think Polter could be the next player we make some money on.

                      Comment

                      • winalotto
                        Gold Seat
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 5524

                        #12
                        Originally posted by MYU
                        That was one of the greatest things about our club, it was also so sad to see the players leave.

                        I think Polter could be the next player we make some money on.
                        Its sad but thats where we are in the food chain , when we try to be and act like a massive club it simply doesn't work , we are far better off developing talent than buying ready made ones.

                        Comment

                        Working...