Pre-emptive post

[Stanley]

He wasn't unsighted. There was noone between hall 30 yards out and him in goal.

And then the deflection after that? Plus the bounce just in front of him?

Sorry but I'm not blaming him on this occasion.

[Romford Hoop]

Woeful keeper, dived over the ball, any keeper should save that sho 99 times out of a hundred, never like or rated him at all, 10 year olds kick better than him, poor in the air, never commands the box, slow to get down to shots, like the first goal, would dump him tomorrow

[bakes8]

And then the deflection after that? Plus the bounce just in front of him?

Sorry but I'm not blaming him on this occasion.

Erm.... The ball deflected off hall 30 yards out. Were u watching a different game?

[lymehoop]

£50,000 a week and the man still can't clear the ball without putting it in row Z

[Stanley]

The ball deflected off hall 30 yards out.

It wasn't 30 yards. Hall was on the edge of the 18 yard box, plus it was travelling.

Anyway, not going to continue arguing over it as I don't wish to take the gloss off a great overall performance against very tough opposition.

[MattyRangers]

£50,000 a week and the man still can't clear the ball without putting it in row Z

Pointless comment ?

[BuffooneRy]

A range of opinions here but I think that if he was on the ground then the ball would have bounced off his body rather than go in under it.... still, I think that it's safe to say that under Ramshackle we would have crumbled so to come back like that was amazing and very very encouraging.... I'm so glad we have Jimmy and hope that those who didn't want him anywhere near the club are re-evaluating their initial views....

[nasser95]

Looked at fault from the Ellerslie. Though Kelvin was very slow closing the player down. Sandro wouldnt have let him get a shot off.

Kelvin was a bit 'chasey' when he first came on, left his man for the sake of closing and unfortunate to see shot hit Hall as it went in. That being said, he should still do better.

[MattyRangers]

Woeful keeper, dived over the ball, any keeper should save that sho 99 times out of a hundred, never like or rated him at all, 10 year olds kick better than him, poor in the air, never commands the box, slow to get down to shots, like the first goal, would dump him tomorrow

Well you clearly don't know a great deal about football pal. He is no world beater, but that's ridiculously OTT.

[Rangers77]

Seen the replay. Think Stanley has a point. Unlucky with the deflection and the wet surface. He ought be disappointed with it though. Think Hall should have stood up to the shot better, tbf. JT style....

[Romford Hoop]

Well you clearly don't know a great deal about football pal. He is no world beater, but that's ridiculously OTT.

Will bow to your great knowledge on football, it is my opinion the bloke is a poor keeper, nothing will change that so not really interested in your opinion on the subject.

[Tarbie]

Henry bottled a challenge and Rob Green fluffed it. Yes it took a slight deflection but a top class keeper gets something on that for me. Both should have done better!

Great fight back though and a very enjoyable night at the Bush!

[Bluehoop]

So many goal keeping experts on one forum

#whatstanleysaid

[march56]

...before the inevitable myopic criticisms appear.

Rob Green was NOT at fault for their second goal for four reasons:

1) He was unsighted
2) Took a nasty deflection
3) Very skiddy surface
4) Bounced just in front of him and the spin changed the direction.

#justsaying

howler!

[A Man Without A Clue]

Green is a dozy git & he needs dropping . And that is all I've got to say about that .