If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Westy suggested 3 at the back, so we could get 2 up front, could that be the answer to the cb conundrum?
4231 works fine so long as the 1 gets enough support from the 3. which is what we've been doing well up until yesterday. So no need to change the formation yet IMO. What bûggered it up was the sending off
Ned is decent but just not as good as Hall and Angella IMO. He's strong quick and good in the air and in the tackle but his distribution is what lets him down at times. Think the other two would make a better paring
I do absolutely agree. It seems like Angella is a bit more vocal aswell. I have never seen Hall before, but he was surpringly good.
Comment