I think one of our major problems at the back is Nedum Onouha

[Rangers77]

This.

Harriman Hall Hill Kpekawa

[rainham r]

not really sure why ned takes so much stick on here,agree he shouldn't be captain.But as a team we have 2 full backs who cant stop crosses and 2 holding midfielders who don't seem able to protect the back 4.Yes he does make mistakes and his distribution is sometimes poor however if you watch what happens when the 2 centre backs are in possession they have very few options as everybody else(jet apart)stand still.As a team yesterday we didn't look too bad then mr ramsey made 3 ridiculous substitutions and we were back to our rubbish looking best.

[dogsrrs]

Yeah I tend to agree even tho Ned needs to up his game but to call him our major problem is being very kind to Perch and co

[Shania]

Funny how he now even gets the blame for NEVER have performed well for us as a CB. I remember the last time we were in this division he was very good when we battled for promotion.Hence, IMO, it seems like he is just dissolutioned about the constant chopping and changing at the club. I think Steven Caulker did suffer from much of the same before he left us.

Even Stanley supported Nedum at some point. I chose to mention Stanley on this "matter" because I value his views on QPR very much.

[Shania]

We need Macca/Dunne/Hill types at CB, no nonsense players who know what they're doing. Ned, sadly, is nothing like these players.

OK, but why did People laugh at me when I suggested Brede Hangeland??

[Jimmy Floyd Rabbit]

Rubbish player. Said the same from day one.

How he's captain is an absolute farce.

[Harryboy]

We have to live and bear it, in our team we have ned and Henry who by Ramsey's book are undropable so will have to suffer leaking goals right left and centre

[Rangers77]

Funny how he now even gets the blame for NEVER have performed well for us as a CB. I remember the last time we were in this division he was very good when we battled for promotion.Hence, IMO, it seems like he is just dissolutioned about the constant chopping and changing at the club. I think Steven Caulker did suffer from much of the same before he left us.

Even Stanley supported Nedum at some point. I chose to mention Stanley on this "matter" because I value his views on QPR very much.

He was OK when next to Dunne. And when Hill playing LB gave us extra height at set pieces. Other than that.....

[Shania]

He was OK when next to Dunne. And when Hill playing LB gave us extra height at set pieces. Other than that.....

Hm, it´s not easy, it´s difficult... But anyway, he is not captain material at this stage.

[Stedders]

He is an appalling defender. Not good enough in any one area of his gamer to make up for the fact he is barely a footballer. As for why he is captain... you'd have to ask Ramsey.

[jmelanie]

He is an appalling defender. Not good enough in any one area of his gamer to make up for the fact he is barely a footballer. As for why he is captain... you'd have to ask Ramsey.

Who would you have as captain

[skranger]

He is an appalling defender. Not good enough in any one area of his gamer to make up for the fact he is barely a footballer. As for why he is captain... you'd have to ask Ramsey.

Exactly ,,, my choice of captain would have been Dunne who would have done a job for us this season,,, better than donkey Ned any day and of the week - even with half his pace

[Jimmy Floyd Rabbit]

Exactly ,,, my choice of captain would have been Dunne who would have done a job for us this season,,, better than donkey Ned any day and of the week - even with half his pace

How they've released Dunne, not selected Hill, who I believe could still do a job at this level at CB and put this clown as skipper is a joke.

[skranger]

How they've released Dunne, not selected Hill, who I believe could still do a job at this level at CB and put this clown as skipper is a joke.

That's rite Jimmy ,,,, u couldn't make it up

[californiahoop]

I understand why they let Dunne go but on reflection, it was an error!