Bamford and sessione(wba player)

[MattyRangers]

Power, Heading abilty, hardworking, Eye for goal, That's Charlie Austin.

Bamford?? Weak 14 year old boy to me.

Winning football league player of the year Ain't too bad for a weak 14 year old boy.

[bakes8]

Winning football league player of the year Ain't too bad for a weak 14 year old boy.

Granted he must have something and looking at his wiki his 1 in 2 goals per game in the Champ defo aint bad. Just can't for the life of me see what all the fuss is about :s

[QPR1976]

Bamford - Surely Middlesborough would be keen ? I'll wager small he doesn't end up at Hillsborough in August.

Seesignon (?) - can't see him dropping to £20k / Championship wages, as per our new structure.


I'd take Bamford on loan
.

[West Acton]

I'm prepared to be convinced. Why would he be immense? What has he got? I don't see any pace, any power and natural passing ability. Gods honest truth I don't see it.

You just described Austin but he has same knack as Austin he finds the net

[winalotto]

His movement is very good for a front man first few yards upstairs means he gets away with not having blistering pace , great touch and he's a finisher, don't know what's not to like, i think he would work very well alongside polter

[Hove Ranger]

Bamford is also 5 years younger than Austin. But they are different players so pointless to compare. Charlie is an out and out goalscorer whereas bamford can play across the front line (in a 3) and behind the striker

[Jimmy Floyd Rabbit]

Sessegnon is a right nippy handful & a player who would do damage in our league.

Havent seen enough of Bamford to make a judgement.

[vanhoop]

Power, Heading abilty, hardworking, Eye for goal, That's Charlie Austin.

Bamford?? Weak 14 year old boy to me.

agree with that bakey boy

[bakes8]

agree with that bakey boy

[1cliveallen]

Don't like loan signings either. He's 21 and if he was good he'd be in the frame at Chelsea like Loftus-Cheek who is quality. He's not.

Be fair charlie Austin wouldn't in the frame if you're honest at Chelsea.. Bamford is an exceptional young talent with great movement..

[bakes8]

Be fair charlie Austin wouldn't in the frame if you're honest at Chelsea.. Bamford is an exceptional young talent with great movement..

? Charlie Austin would get games if he signed for Chelsea this season. Bamford wont. (IMO)

[1cliveallen]

Ba ford has more chance of a game at Chelsea because he's a Chelsea player. Chelsea won't sign Austin because he's not good enough to play for them.

[bakes8]

Ba ford has more chance of a game at Chelsea because he's a Chelsea player. Chelsea won't sign Austin because he's not good enough to play for them.

If Bamford was in the frame at Chelsea why are they looking to loan him out all the time? Don't give me ######## that he's young as he's 22 in a few weeks, not 18.

[1cliveallen]

I'm not saying he will play just saying he's a very talented player. We've got supposed young "talent" all at a similar age to bamford who haven't played for us many times, does that make them pony?

[bakes8]

I'm not saying he will play just saying he's a very talented player. We've got supposed young "talent" all at a similar age to bamford who haven't played for us many times, does that make them pony?

Didn't say he was pony, just I have never seen why he is so highly rated. Whenever I've seen him he's been weak, though his goalscoring record is decent.

Guess if he plays regular in the Champ this season I'll get to see what the fuss is all about.