Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Phil Beard Resigns.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stanley
    replied
    Originally posted by vblockranger
    So if they walk then we wont be needing any buckets?
    No. Why would we?

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott Jones
    replied
    He was Chelsea anyway.

    F'ing useless and deserves to get his head caved in if he every steps foot near HQ again.

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by QPR Richard
    You get the feeling he wants the club in total sh!t
    Actually i want the total sh!t out of the club,,,,getting there!

    Leave a comment:


  • QPR Richard
    replied
    Originally posted by West London is Rss
    Oh god.. I bet you've got that day pencilled in haven't you V?!
    You get the feeling he wants the club in total sh!t

    Leave a comment:


  • Mattyqpr
    replied
    Originally posted by West London is Rss
    Heeeeeerrrrreeeee we go again.. I think most just feel its slightly harsh to absolutely vilify someone who is trying to do their best and has their heart in the right place... As well as running a multi-million pound airline.
    I think everyone agrees his heart is in the right place but that doesn't make him the messiah who can't be criticised or put to blame.

    Even TF admits he made a lot of mistakes. It's only now everything is starting to hit home and it looks like we're making progress. If we stay up, which I believe we will, everything will look better than it ever has and the club will be in it's strongest position since TF joined. It really is a huge few months for the club, on and off the pitch.

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by West London is Rss
    Oh god.. I bet you've got that day pencilled in haven't you V?!
    First away win all season, Harry gone, Beard gone.... been a good few days! hope it continues

    Leave a comment:


  • West London is Rss
    replied
    Originally posted by vblockranger
    Debt is debt Rich or have they written it off like Tony tweeted? guess we will find out if the debt is still in QPR's name when the ne accounts are viewable very soon. Bet Uncle Plum goes into a twitter frenzy that week :-)
    Oh god.. I bet you've got that day pencilled in haven't you V?!

    Leave a comment:


  • QPR Richard
    replied
    Looks like a months notice has been given. For such a senior position it doesn't seem long. I would guess this has been brewing for a while and maybe the board have decided to have a complete clean sweep.

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by Stanley
    The club isn't being put into debt. The debt is to the shareholders who have given assurances that it's at their own personal risk, not the club's. So if/when they ever leave any outstanding debt would be written off (or paid off, as in the case of the £27m Barclays loan) and not passed on to the club.

    The above is not my personal take but what the owners themselves have stated, a statement which they can be held accountable for. So isn't it about time this myth was destroyed about the debt being to QPR FC ?
    So if they walk then we wont be needing any buckets? Quick go tell Rich! :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by QPR Richard
    I think you'll find the debt is owned by the shareholders, not banks. Who's going to buy the club with debt? They won't be selling anytime soon.

    And if they do, you get to realise your life's ambition, chief bucket supervisor

    Debt is debt Rich or have they written it off like Tony tweeted? guess we will find out if the debt is still in QPR's name when the new accounts are viewable very soon. Bet Uncle Plum goes into a twitter frenzy that week :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • Hitman34
    replied
    Originally posted by Glevum_Hoop
    Does this mean we think we've lost the argument over new stadium at OAC?
    Of course it does. The stadium has now gone for a burton.
    Bruised knees for the foreseeable future me thinks.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stanley
    replied
    Originally posted by vblockranger
    If they go who will you blame for putting the club into a position where it is massively in debt and needs buckets i wonder?
    The club isn't being put into debt. The debt is to the shareholders who have given assurances that it's at their own personal risk, not the club's. So if/when they ever leave, any outstanding debt would be written off by them (or paid off, as in the case of the £27m Barclays loan) and not passed on to the club.

    The above is not my personal take but what the owners themselves have stated, a statement which they can be held accountable for. So isn't it about time this myth was destroyed about the debt being to QPR FC ?

    Leave a comment:


  • West London is Rss
    replied
    Heeeeeerrrrreeeee we go again.. I think most just feel its slightly harsh to absolutely vilify someone who is trying to do their best and has their heart in the right place... As well as running a multi-million pound airline.

    Leave a comment:


  • QPR Richard
    replied
    Originally posted by vblockranger
    If they go who will you blame for putting the club into a position where it is massively in debt and needs buckets i wonder? Never going to be there fault is it Rich?
    I think you'll find the debt is owned by the shareholders, not banks. Who's going to buy the club with debt? They won't be selling anytime soon.

    And if they do, you get to realise your life's ambition, chief bucket supervisor

    Leave a comment:


  • Mattyqpr
    replied
    Originally posted by QPR Richard
    Once V has got his way and outed TF perhaps he can then be put in charge of the buckets....
    Why would we need buckets? Because our chairman has naively racked up huge debt with absolutely no planning? Three and a half years and what's happened?

    Leave a comment:

Working...