Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Phil Beard Resigns.
Collapse
X
-
He was Chelsea anyway.
F'ing useless and deserves to get his head caved in if he every steps foot near HQ again.Leave a comment:
-
-
-
I think everyone agrees his heart is in the right place but that doesn't make him the messiah who can't be criticised or put to blame.
Even TF admits he made a lot of mistakes. It's only now everything is starting to hit home and it looks like we're making progress. If we stay up, which I believe we will, everything will look better than it ever has and the club will be in it's strongest position since TF joined. It really is a huge few months for the club, on and off the pitch.Leave a comment:
-
-
Oh god.. I bet you've got that day pencilled in haven't you V?!Leave a comment:
-
Looks like a months notice has been given. For such a senior position it doesn't seem long. I would guess this has been brewing for a while and maybe the board have decided to have a complete clean sweep.Leave a comment:
-
So if they walk then we wont be needing any buckets? Quick go tell Rich! :-)The club isn't being put into debt. The debt is to the shareholders who have given assurances that it's at their own personal risk, not the club's. So if/when they ever leave any outstanding debt would be written off (or paid off, as in the case of the £27m Barclays loan) and not passed on to the club.
The above is not my personal take but what the owners themselves have stated, a statement which they can be held accountable for. So isn't it about time this myth was destroyed about the debt being to QPR FC ?Leave a comment:
-
Debt is debt Rich or have they written it off like Tony tweeted? guess we will find out if the debt is still in QPR's name when the new accounts are viewable very soon. Bet Uncle Plum goes into a twitter frenzy that week :-)Leave a comment:
-
-
The club isn't being put into debt. The debt is to the shareholders who have given assurances that it's at their own personal risk, not the club's. So if/when they ever leave, any outstanding debt would be written off by them (or paid off, as in the case of the £27m Barclays loan) and not passed on to the club.
The above is not my personal take but what the owners themselves have stated, a statement which they can be held accountable for. So isn't it about time this myth was destroyed about the debt being to QPR FC ?Leave a comment:
-
Heeeeeerrrrreeeee we go again.. I think most just feel its slightly harsh to absolutely vilify someone who is trying to do their best and has their heart in the right place... As well as running a multi-million pound airline.Leave a comment:
-
I think you'll find the debt is owned by the shareholders, not banks. Who's going to buy the club with debt? They won't be selling anytime soon.
And if they do, you get to realise your life's ambition, chief bucket supervisor
Leave a comment:
-

Leave a comment: