Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Phil Beard Resigns.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • West London is Rss
    replied
    Originally posted by vblockranger
    What facts?
    I give up.

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by West London is Rss
    Why do you ignore all the facts and valid info people put to you?

    What facts?

    Leave a comment:


  • West London is Rss
    replied
    Originally posted by vblockranger
    There arent many Chairmen who worry that much about branding, PR, and increasing his profile to sell his plane tickets either. We are a novelty.
    Why do you ignore all the facts and valid info people put to you about it? You really are fully brainwashed into this anti-TF stuff.
    So many people put more than valid reasoning and facts in front of you and you just cover your ears and write another line about TF.

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Rangersw12
    replied
    Originally posted by Stanley
    That fine is by far a foregone conclusion.

    A) We'd need to be relegated.

    B) The FL ruling is far from being legally water-tight and QPR FC know that and will challenge it, together with all the other affected clubs who know it full well too.
    We will still be liable for the fine even if we stay up this year

    as for B I agree but the point is at the moment QPR are 150 million in debt going by the accounts so the board saying they will write it off ( will believe that when I see it) is irrelevant

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by MYU
    His money, let him do what he likes and how he does it.
    Up to a point but not if he forgets he is just the current caretaker of the club. Flavio and Bernie had to be reminded and they didnt like it much. Bad PR having a few hundred fans outside the front door calling him a carnt :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by Stanley
    Precisely.

    Now we just need a football-savvy one. Or maybe not if Les is now DoF. Is there really that much difference in the job descriptions?
    Maybe Les is now running the club on a day to day? Lol he has landed on his feet hasnt he? Maybe thats the plan..

    Leave a comment:


  • MYU
    replied
    His money, let him do what he likes and how he does it.

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by West London is Rss
    There aren't many premier league clubs that have a chairman/owner who run the football club on a day to day basis anymore.
    There arent many Chairmen who worry that much about branding, PR, and increasing his profile to sell his plane tickets either. We are a novelty.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stanley
    replied
    Originally posted by Mattyqpr
    That's the CEO's job though isn't it? No point having one if the chairman is running the show daily.
    Precisely.

    Now we just need a football-savvy one. Or maybe not if Les is now DoF. Is there really that much difference in the job descriptions?

    Leave a comment:


  • vblockranger
    replied
    Originally posted by Mattyqpr
    That's the CEO's job though isn't it? No point having one if the chairman is running the show daily.
    I agree...If the CEO is good enough then no point having a Chairman sticking his nose in and tweeting sh!t. A Chairman doing his job in the background would be a novel idea for our club last few years.

    Leave a comment:


  • James1979
    replied
    Originally posted by W5R
    He was Chelsea anyway.

    F'ing useless and deserves to get his head caved in if he every steps foot near HQ again.
    Chelsea ? Really or you don't like him so he must be Chelsea. He was ok Phil in my book, tried his best. More than can be said for that chump Harry

    Leave a comment:


  • West London is Rss
    replied
    Originally posted by vblockranger
    Still would be better to have an ever present Chairman who can devote all his time to the running of the football club as his only business. That and a football savvy CEO and we will really be getting somewhere.
    I think this is hard to find at any club... If it were that easy then everyone would be doing it. Most people that purchase football clubs are wealthy businessman who run their business's as their main priority. A football club is nothing but a hobby and interest to them - The owners business's are what pumps the money in!

    Directors of Football/CEO's/vice-chairman are put in place to take the reins on a day to day basis. There aren't many premier league clubs that have a chairman/owner who run the football club on a day to day basis anymore.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mattyqpr
    replied
    Originally posted by vblockranger
    Still would be better to have an ever present Chairman who can devote all his time to the running of the football club as his only business. That and a football savvy CEO and we will really be getting somewhere.
    That's the CEO's job though isn't it? No point having one if the chairman is running the show daily.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ed the Ball
    replied
    Originally posted by Glevum_Hoop
    Does this mean we think we've lost the argument over new stadium at OAC?
    No it means the club is being overhauled by Sir Les and Beard wasn't cutting it.

    Leave a comment:

Working...